Adam and others, Not to take sides on this issue...I've always been curious why the scientific community gets so caught up with the lack of information on the location of the Sahara finds when the "pristine and pure" Antarctica finds are only located relative to the winds and shifting ice...having nothing to do with where they landed. I would think that making pairings of Antarctica finds is as difficult, or even more than the desert finds.
I guess locations do provide patterns of such finds and the possibly the mechanics that congregate them, but nothing more. In the desert we certainly would have less numbers and more pairings if the finds were kept together and the research was completed. Another point is that the Antarctica finds are certainly less handled by man...the great contaminator. Puzzled as usual, John ______________________________________________ Meteorite-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
