Yawn, Mike, why don't you start reporting accurate figures becuase if you don't we will.
All the best, ----- Original Message ----- From: "Michael Farmer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Adam Hupe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "Meteoryt.net" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 2004 5:54 PM Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] New slices: LAMPIAYRIE from Burkina Faso > YAWN, Adam, dont try and drag me into another fight just a few days after I > get back on the list. I know that is your goal, and two people have already > called me regarding your attempt. It is getting old. > If you have proof that there is 250 kilos of this, SHOW us or dont bother > saying it. > I have been to Burkina Faso two times, and know the seller, I bought all he > offered to me. I am sure they are just holding all these hundreds of kilos > back so that someone else will pay them less money. > Mike Farmer > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Adam Hupe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: "Meteoryt.net" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 2004 5:34 PM > Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] New slices: LAMPIAYRIE from Burkina Faso > > > > Hi Again, > > > > Thank you for clearing up the IMB issue as the specimens we have did not > > indicate this. After revisiting your web-site I see how it was > > misinterpreted. Thank you for showing the largest fragment thus far > > reported. At 4.25 kilos and only a fraction of the stone it came from we > are > > beginning to believe the 250 plus kilogram figure we heard as the TKW of > > this fall. Could this fragment have come from the rumored 60 kilogram > main > > mass? > > > > Thank you, once again, for clearing up the IMB issue. > > > > Adam and Greg Hupe > > The Hupe Collection > > IMCA 2185 > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Meteoryt.net" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: "Adam Hupe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 2004 5:25 PM > > Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] New slices: LAMPIAYRIE from Burkina Faso > > > > > > > > Congratulations on being the first to bring this new fall to market. > > This > > > > is some very nice looking material. I see on your website that you > are > > > > calling it an L IMB. I was told it classified as an L5, does anybody > > know > > > > > > no,no no. I add tooday new slices of Burkina Fall AND new slices of > > Suevite > > > in Impact Breccia section, so together this looks like I called > Lampiayrie > > > (or Batiawo as Mike write) IMB. My mistake and now fixed. > > > > > > > if this correct? Most IMBs are shock darkened and show material flow > is > > > why > > > > I am asking. This material seems to show a single light colored > > lithology. > > > > Does anybody have a recent TKW figure for this fall? Several figures > > have > > > > been passed around and I am curious to which one is correct. > > > > > > > > The curious want to know, > > > > > > About a TKW I dont know. But I dont think that this 2kg specimen is > really > > > main mass, becouse I have photos of 3 specimens and largest is fragment > > > 4.25kg. www.meteoryt.net\ogloszenia.htm . > > > > > > > > > -----[ MARCIN CIMALA ]-----[ I.M.C.A.#3667 ]----- > > > http://www.Meteoryt.net [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > http://www.PolandMET.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > http://www.Gao-Guenie.com GSM +48(607)535 195 > > > --------[ Member of: Polish Meteoritical Society ]-------- > > > > > > > > > ______________________________________________ > > > Meteorite-list mailing list > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list > > > > ______________________________________________ > > Meteorite-list mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list > > > > ______________________________________________ Meteorite-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list