Hello List, Björn wrote (in a private mail):
"Would like to see your comments. Also from a scientific point of view" Here's my response (excerpts - I'm leaving out my private remarks) because I think this is of general interest to all of us who acquired a piece of this (still) enigmatic meteorite: There is not very much I can say about the Moss meteorite as I don't know it in person - I've only seen some pictures so far. It looks very much like a CO or a CK chondrite. I don't believe it is a Kakangari-like meteorite (see David Weir's previous post to the List) but if it was one, that would be a blast, of course! If it is a KAK, it should have some of these characteristics: - its oxidation state resembles that of enstatite chondrites - there is a high abundance of pyroxene (more than olivine) - its oxygen isotopes are comparable to those of CH or CR chondrites - a high metal content similar to that of H chondrites. If Jeff Kuyken's observation (see his website) about Moss chondrule size is correct, 0.25-0.30 mm, this would favor a CO classification. CK chondrites tend to have a chondrule size of 0.8 mm. KAK meteorites have a chondrule size of 0.69 mm (according to Hutchison). Jeff's estimate of the volume of chondrules (about 50%) would also favor a CO classification (40 vol %) instead of 15 vol % for CK's or 19% for KAK. Whatever it is, it is a beautiful, pristine new fall ... Cheers, Bernd ______________________________________________ Meteorite-list mailing list Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
