> (wondering myself where the last two replies went.)
> Darren said that a lack of crater made this news item
> suspect.
>
> What I said was:
> The researcher did say this was an aerial burst and be it
> remembered that Tunguska didn’t leave a crater (else
> minor one) and it wasn’t exploding over what at the time
> was around 2miles/ 3kms of ice sheet.
>
> I suspect the reporter is amiss for not providing
> specifics. Perhaps they were too hyper or too stupored and
> in trying to soundbite a subject they probably knew little
> about co-mingled a lot terms.
>
> The researcher was discussing dust of micro-nano size
> collected in glacial sediments/out flow channels vic the
> terminal moraine(my words). I don’t believe the
> researcher was implying that the kimberlite-derived
> diamonds , nor the gold and silver ores mined in Canada
> are related to the dust.--only that the epicenter could
> have been over some mining districts.
>
> This ties well into the material that E.P. Grondine
> already posted about the decimation of mammoth and human
> populations at the 12000± year mark in northern North
> America. I am a wee surprised that there was no mention of
> the spheroid containing black mats found in similar
> deposits. This is building evidence that the Younger Dryas
> interval was triggered by a cometary encounter which caused
> a global cooling event lasting 1200 ± years.
>
> Elton
______________________________________________
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
