The variation in fireball rate with time of year and geographical position
is well described. Recent observational data is not dependent on direct
human observations, but can be accurately quantified from instrumental data.
For instance, I have years worth of nightly allsky records covering
Colorado, and can produce very accurate information about meteor frequency
and brightness. This is easily extrapolated to full Earth coverage. And
there is similar instrumental data from around the world. Actual meteor
rates are very similar over the entire Earth, with only a very slight
variation associated with latitude (after allowing for meteors associated
with showers, which are not completely uniform).
Chris
*****************************************
Chris L Peterson
Cloudbait Observatory
http://www.cloudbait.com
----- Original Message -----
From: "Meteorites USA" <e...@meteoritesusa.com>
To: <bernd.pa...@paulinet.de>; <meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com>
Sent: Wednesday, March 25, 2009 12:41 PM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Fusion Crusted "Meteoroids"
I agree with you, but isn't that assuming that all things are equal across
the globe? They are not...
Humans experience fieballs and meteors based on what? Witnessing an event.
How much land area do humans actually occupy in relation to unpopulated
areas, oceans, seas, lakes, and other large bodies of water and ice? Don't
forget about the north and south poles... What's the percentage/ratio? If
you know that number then you can accurately predict ratios to estimate
"viewable" events over a given land mass right?
______________________________________________
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
