Hi Paul: We actually talked about this at "asteroid lunch" yesterday! The case against a tsunami is that there is no other evidence anywhere along the US coast or on the other side of the Atlantic. Skeptics think that it could just as easily been a huge hurricane storm surge. Do not know much more than that.
Larry > > Giant tsunami swept through New York City 2,000 years ago, > say scientists by David Gardner, Mail online, May 4, 2009. > > http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/worldnews/article-1177049/Giant-tsunami-swept-New-York-City-2-000-years-ago-say-scientists.html > > Tsunami may have hit NYC area 300 BC, United Press > International, May 4, 2009â > > http://www.upi.com/Science_News/2009/05/04/Tsunami-may-have-hit-NYC-area-300-BC/UPI-63041241482725/ > > Ancient tsunami 'hit New York', BBC News, > http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/8028949.stm > http://newsvote.bbc.co.uk/mpapps/pagetools/print/news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/8028949.stm?ad=1 > > Yours, > > Paul H. > > > > > ______________________________________________ > http://www.meteoritecentral.com > Meteorite-list mailing list > Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com > http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list > ______________________________________________ http://www.meteoritecentral.com Meteorite-list mailing list Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
