Hi Listees,
Recently there's been more interest in the Tunguska event. More
scientists are trying to explain it, and some are even looking at a lake
near the blasts epicenter believing that this is the missing crater.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/6239334.stm
Photo of Lake Cheko:
http://a52.g.akamaitech.net/f/52/827/1d/www.space.com/images/070626_lake_cheko_02.jpg
A witness in Vanovara (36 Miles SE of the epicenter) said in O. Richard
Norton's "Rocks From Space"
"The crash was followed by noise like stones falling from the sky, or
guns firing."
and
"when I lay on the ground I covered my head because I was afraid that
stones might hit it."
We all know too well that witness reports aren't ideal information but
useful anyway. But, how would this person know to say that there was a
"noise like stones falling" unless that were the case? Or did the
witnesses report become tainted after countless interviews? How many
times was this witness interviewed?
I know people have searched for meteorites under and around the
epicenter area. But what if this was a stony meteoroid, and the
explosion blasted meteorite pieces 30-50 miles away. The devastation
this explosion caused is evidence that it was one hell of a blast and
was on par with a nuclear explosion.
YouTube Video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EiXpp-i442s
Donald Yoemans (JPL) states in the History Channel video that this blast
was 15 megatons of equivalent energy "roughly 1000 times that of the
Hiroshima blast."
VERY COOL ARTIST RENDERING: http://svidea.us/misha/image/tunguska2.jpg
Photos of Devastation:
http://astro.wsu.edu/worthey/astro/html/im-meteor/tunguska-photo.jpg
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/ad/Tunguska.png
http://www.wilsonsalmanac.com/images1/tunguska3.jpg
http://www.world-mysteries.com/sci_tu3.gif
Artist Rendering: http://aura.gaia.com/photos/34/338910/large/tunguska-1.jpg
Area Map: http://www.world-mysteries.com/sci_tunguska1.gif
Blast Damage Area: http://www.world-mysteries.com/sci_tu2.gif
When you factor in all this information, how come people aren't looking
30-40 miles away for debris from this blast. If it was as powerful as
they say (as evidenced by the downed trees and other devastation)
wouldn't it make perfect sense that area around the blast would be
completely void of meteorites as is the case?
Having said that, wouldn't it be prudent to look further away from the
blasts epicenter for fragments? How far will a blast such as that throw
debris? If a Navy destroyer can launch a huge shell a hundred miles
using a few pounds of gunpowder, how far can a meteoroid blast such as
this launch stone fragments?
Bomb squad techs and investigators will be the first to tell you that
there's always something left over from a blast no matter how powerful.
Pieces get thrown sometimes miles from the epicenter of powerful blast.
In the case of Tunguska this blast was nuclear powerful! Yes a lot of
the mass would have been melted and disintegrated but, how likely is it
really that the blast would make ALL trace of the meteoroid disappear?
Could there be meteorite pieces within a 30-50 mile ring around the
epicenter?
--
Regards,
Eric Wichman
Meteorites USA
http://www.meteoritesusa.com
904-236-5394
______________________________________________
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
