Hi Mike,

The process you have performed is called "Reverse Electrolysis". It is typically used to conserve iron or other metallic objects by removing salts or other corrosive elements that have penetrated the object. It is most commonly used to conserve iron shipwreck objects found in salt water.

Best regards,
Greg

====================
Greg Hupe
The Hupe Collection
NaturesVault (eBay)
gmh...@htn.net
www.LunarRock.com
IMCA 3163
====================
Click here for my current eBay auctions: http://search.ebay.com/_W0QQsassZnaturesvault



----- Original Message ----- From: "Michael Murray" <mmur...@montrose.net>
To: <countde...@earthlink.net>
Cc: "Meteorite-list" <meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com>
Sent: Monday, September 28, 2009 8:46 PM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Flow lines on the INSIDE! Not. (cleaning ironsfollow-up)


Hi All,
I put my little suspect iron in a solution of water and calcium carbonate. I actually wrapped it loosely with tinfoil and sat that down in the mixture. I got out my trusty battery charger and connected the red lead to a sacrificial piece of junk strap metal and sat that down along one side of the plastic bowl. I connected the black lead to the tinfoil. Actually clamping it against the side of the bowl same as I did the piece of strap on the other side of the bowl. Anyway, I poured in a couple teaspoons cleanser and swished it around with a plastic spoon so it was dissolved good. Plugged in the charger and watched as a steady stream of bubbles headed from the tinfoil towards the sacrificial anode strap. After about two hours of cooking, I can now see what I have. A really sculptured, bright chrome something that is as hard or harder than tool steel (don't ask how I know that last bit) and shaped like a stretched out version of Willamette. I did a nickel test and think now with all I see that it might need to go to someone to get checked further if I want to know for sure. Anyway, the process worked better than I was expecting. Doesn't seem to be dangerous to do. I put the charger on 12V, 6 amp scale. I left the solution outside when it was cooking. I treated my specimen to a bath in penetrating oil when I had finished cleaning it. One more interesting tidbit, looks like after the red rust was removed, left on the suspect rock is a very thin black coating in quite a few places, mostly in the low spots. If that is magnetite then I answered my own question, no, the process doesn't remove the oxide, only the red rust. My little experiment worked well enough for my purposes, but hopefully no one with a stone of any value will follow my lead. I would hate to think I inspired someone to ruin a valuable specimen.

Mike in CO



On Sep 28, 2009, at 1:52 PM, countde...@earthlink.net wrote:

Hi Jason, Piper, Mike and List,

Gathering my tattered cloak up to cover myself, I must say that even I, with less than a year in the game, wouldn't be so ignorant as to say I saw flow lines on the INSIDE of a specimen. What I said.. and did see.. were..and I will be a bit more descriptive here...nearly parallel, but sinuous, thin, rounded, iron lines orientated in one direction on the outside surface of a formerly concreted and rusted Nantan that I had blasted the crap out of and wirebrushed. It looks lovely. Maybe I should put it eBay and call it a 100% crusted and oriented individual...:o}

Guido

-----Original Message-----
From: Jason Utas <meteorite...@gmail.com>
Sent: Sep 28, 2009 4:45 AM
To: Meteorite-list <meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com>
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] "flow lines" on weathered irons (was "question on cleaning irons")

Hello Piper,
Of course - hence the differential weathering rates of Campos ("old"
versus "new"), to name one of many examples.
Perhaps the best example of such weathering can be seen on irons from
Gibeon.  I unfortunately don't have a copy of Buchwald here, but if
anyone does have access to the second volume, if they could flip
through the Gibeon section, they would find a photograph of a
beautiful mass of Gibeon (I forget the name of the mass) on display  in
a museum in Germany.  It displays beautiful fusion crust and
smooth-edged, shallow regmaglypts - it looks as fresh as many  Sikhotes
on the market today.  Compare it to many of the larger Gibeons on  ebay
today and you'll see little-to-no resemblance.  If anyone out there
can scan a picture of said page, I'd be much obliged.  It really is a
good example.
There are, however, a few common irons which I would never expect to
have fusion crust: Canyon Diablo, Toluca, Odessa, and Nantan, to name
a few.  I've seen hundreds, if not thousands of examples of each, and
I have never seen a single one of any of them that came close to  being
"fresh" enough to retain a trace of fusion crust.
Nantan is one of the most corroded and least stable iron meteorites I
have ever known, though Dronino's turning out to be about as bad.
People need to learn more in order to clear up the misconception that
all meteorites show signs of a hot, violent entry through the
atmosphere; I see NWA's on ebay all the time that are nothing but old
weathered fragments coated with desert varnish.  Check out this
seller:

http://myworld.ebay.com/eegooblago/

Almost all of his stones are covered in a 'glossy fusion crust.'  Oh
wait - those are just desert varnished fragments that have been
weathered to hell.  Most of the melt features the seller notes are  due
to sandblasting and corrosion, and s/he goes so far as to say that  the
cracks in his stones formed when they hit the ground!  Anyone  remotely
familiar with meteorites and weathering processes knows that over
thousands of years, meteorites fracture and break apart, in a manner
completely unrelated to their having impacted the Earth.
This seems like a very similar misconception; Guido even notes  finding
flow lines on the inside of the meteorite, having broken it open.
There's no way there would have been any flow lines on the surface of
the iron, never mind the inside of it.  It simply isn't possible.
Regards,
Jason

On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 12:47 AM, Piper R.W. Hollier <pi...@xs4all.nl> wrote:
Hi Guido, Jason, Mike, and list,

At 22:33 27-09-09, Jason wrote:

Regardless of how well you cleaned your Nantan, whatever you found
under the surface was not flow lines.

It appears that the layers of taenite and kamacite do not always oxidize at
the same rate at the surface of a buried iron. This would make sense
intuitively, since the proportion of nickel is different. Just as nitol has a differential effect on taenite and kamacite in the lab, some conditions of soil chemistry might produce an analogous result in the strewn field, albeit much more slowly. What is sometimes left after a long period of weathering
is a pattern of parallel grooves on the outer surface that might be
(mis)interpreted as flow lines.

This is an effect that I first noticed on a thick slice of Toluca from Alain Carion's collection that was on display at a wonderful exhibition at the Ecole des Mines in Paris in 1998. The correspondence between the shallow ridges on the oxidized edge of the slice and the Widmanstaetten pattern of
the cut surface was rather obvious.

There might be something about the specific soil chemistry at the site that could make this effect more pronounced at some localities (e.g. Nantan or
Toluca) by enhancing the difference in oxidation rate.

Piper

______________________________________________
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list

______________________________________________
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list

______________________________________________
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list

______________________________________________
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list



______________________________________________
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list

Reply via email to