Yo,
Well, I don't fully agree that Al's suggestion is the reason why West
was so expensive, but it may well have been a factor.
Greg, you said:

> Look at it this way (its how I do anyway)
> Compare Carancas... It sold for $100 per gram and they had to travel from the 
> USA to Peru.
> West... it also sold for $100 per gram and they had to travel to Texas from 
> the USA (many only one or two states away)
> What costs more? The travel to Texas or Peru?

Well, it costs more when thirty people travel to Texas, stay there for
several weeks, (and pay a base price for much of their material) than
when five go to Peru, stay for a few days, and buy their rocks for
pennies on the dollar.  That was his point - which is similar to, but
different from what I said earlier - "So the finders were looking to
make the most of their sales with very
limited material: hence, even higher prices."

Al goes farther, suggesting that the price of the fall actually has/d
a direct correlation with the overall expenses of the hunters.  To
which I say...no.  I mean, maybe to some small extent, but, generally
speaking, this principle doesn't apply to meteorites *at all.*  Look
at the $2-4/g price tag on Thuathe, $20/g price tag on Buzzard Coulee,
or the $10/g price tag on Ben Sour.

Maybe the prices are lower because the dealers brought back a large
amount and are trying to move all of their material, but if I were
looking to sell any of my Ash Creek stones, I wouldn't pul out a
calculator and plug away at our expenses before giving out a price.
I'd look at the material from a tkw, aesthetic, and rarity standpoint,
and then judge.  And this is where Ash Creek becomes more of an
enigma.

It seems to me that whenever there's a fall in a nearby place and a
larger number of listmembers and personal friends make the trip,
prices just...go up.  It's not a factor of the cost of the trip - it's
a hype factor that surrounds the fall itself.  It's there, it's now,
they're there, they're finding them *right now.*  The market doesn't
usually have such a sense of immediacy...

Regards,
Jason

On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 8:18 PM, Greg Catterton
<star_wars_collec...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Hi to all, I thought I would add my 2 pennies...
>
> I would have to disagree, I think the more hunters, the cheaper the material 
> due to more people having material for sale and less chance for a select few 
> "friends" to set what they all will charge.
>
> Look at it this way (its how I do anyway)
> Compare Carancas... It sold for $100 per gram and they had to travel from the 
> USA to Peru.
>
> West... it also sold for $100 per gram and they had to travel to Texas from 
> the USA (many only one or two states away)
>
> What costs more? The travel to Texas or Peru?
>
> Carancas had a much lower TKW then West (west TKW is more then double), made 
> a crater and had a ton on media not to mention was of much more scientific 
> importance then west due to the circumstances of the fall, crater and events 
> that surrounded it.
>
> Thanks to Mike Farmer, the media attention around Carancas doubled. (not 
> really a bad thing, but more a fact - his "escape" made for great reading and 
> a neat story.)
>
> Its my opinion, however unpopular,  that new falls are about getting as much 
> profit as possible as fast as possible... I also think inaccurate reports of 
> TW lead to the higher price of West - I still see people clearly stating that 
> only about 3 kilos were recovered when I know of many who walked away with 
> several kilos themselves!
>
> Another example of West and meteorite politics (which leads to these high 
> prices)... The same people who were ready to exclude and not "allow" people 
> to the AZ fall location (and used the excuse "we dont want others running in 
> our backyard like they did in west") were actually the same ones doing just 
> that to others backyards at West.
>
> I really think that the price is more about who gets there first and who is 
> "allowed" to hunt the field.
> Meteorites are competitive and my eyes were opened to just how much so due to 
> recent falls.
>
> When I first got into meteorites, I thought it was a pretty open group that 
> welcomed newer members/collectors and future hunters. I quickly found out 
> that not many are willing to "help the competition" and its basicly dog eat 
> dog.
>
> Sure, many are willing to help you build your collection by selling you 
> meteorites, but very few are actually willing to lend/offer first hand 
> teaching and "in field" experience to those that want to learn from the 
> people that are supposed to be "the best".
>
> I know my thoughts on this topic are not too popular with some, but I am 
> honestly speaking from what I have seen looking in from the sidelines.
>
> Greg C.
>
>
>
> --- On Tue, 11/3/09, al mitt <alm...@kconline.com> wrote:
>
>> From: al mitt <alm...@kconline.com>
>> Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Ash Creek the most expensive ordinary 
>> chondrite?‏
>> To: Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
>> Date: Tuesday, November 3, 2009, 9:22 PM
>> Hi Greg and all,
>>
>> While I think there are a lot of good points on why this
>> meteorite was expensive, I think there is another factor in
>> all this as well.
>> The more people, meteorite hunters, collectors and so on
>> that descend on a fall, the more expenses that have to be
>> added into the cost. If you only have 50lbs (22.7 kilos) of
>> material (for example) and fifty hunters, the cost for
>> travel, motel, time and effort and payment to land owners
>> will make that fall higher in price. If only a half dozen
>> hunters search the area then the price would be
>> substantially less. This assumes that they all find an
>> average amount of material.
>>
>> I realize there is no way of knowing for certain how much
>> material survived passage or can be found but seems if every
>> meteorite hunter in a two thousand mile radius heads out and
>> there are more hunters than material we're in for an
>> expensive fall.
>>
>> I've heard some comments about fewer searchers then better
>> chance of hunters price fixing but I don't think this would
>> happen in most cases. I believe in the credibility of most
>> hunters and collectors. As I have said many times before,
>> ultimately it is what someone is willing to pay for an item
>> that will dictate the price of material. Usually about a
>> year after the fall is the best priced material. Well my two
>> grams worth.
>>
>> All my best!
>>
>> --AL Mitterling
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Greg Stanley" <stanleygr...@hotmail.com>
>> To: <oxytropidoce...@cox.net>;
>> <meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com>
>> Sent: Tuesday, November 03, 2009 12:18 PM
>> Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Ash Creek the most expensive
>> ordinary chondrite?‏
>>
>>
>>
>> > All:
>> >
>> > I think the reason Ash Creek has a higher value is
>> because of the publicity. It was major news among the
>> meteorite community; even outside the meteorite community.
>> Also, it was the first fall/find that occurred in the US for
>> a number of years, and was captued on video. This all
>> created the increased interest and demand, and thus
>> increased the price. The Buzzard Coulee meteorite was also
>> much larger (TKW) and did not receive the same marketing as
>> Ash Creek.
>> >
>> > One thing that I do find odd is that there are NWA's
>> and even OC's that demand high dollars compared to others
>> that are the same classification. It just boils down to
>> supply/demand and some good marketing and publicity. I may
>> pay hundreds of dollars for a meteorite and be satisfied,
>> while someone else may think it has little value. That's one
>> of the things that makes it such an interesting hobby.
>> >
>> > Greg S.
>>
>>
>> ______________________________________________
>> http://www.meteoritecentral.com
>> Meteorite-list mailing list
>> Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
>> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
>>
>
>
>
> ______________________________________________
> http://www.meteoritecentral.com
> Meteorite-list mailing list
> Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
>
______________________________________________
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list

Reply via email to