Hi Adam,

I think eventually the scientific community will embrace it. A large collection of highly intelligent minds think rather slowly apparently. ;) Patience... Historically there's a process of belief vs proof and that helps hypothesis and theory to evolves into self evident fact.. At first people are not receptive and it gets ignored, then they argue against it, then it becomes plausible, and finally it becomes a viable theory, which in turn becomes fact based on empirical evidence. Only then will something become "accepted". Like I said before, the evidence of extraterrestrial life is growing.

You mention Mars and exploration... I found this the other day.
Symphony of Science - The Case For Mars
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BZ5sWfhkpE0

Enjoy...

Eric



On 8/21/2010 1:17 PM, Adam Hupe wrote:
Martian meteorite NWA 998 displays an abundance of these "fossils" and is
proving to be much richer than ALH84001:

If the scientific community ever completely embraces the idea, then we will
witness another surge in the importance they represent.  In any case, all of the
talk of Martian fossils and life helped lift Mars into the forefront making it
easier to justify all of the missions taking place there.  In my opinion,
ALH84001 and the scientists who studied it are mostly responsible for the
renewed interest in Mars.


Here is a link to a recent article on NWA 998:
http://skymania.com/wp/2010/04/new-meteorite-clues-to-life-on-mars.html

Best Regards,

Adam




----- Original Message ----
From: Meteorites USA<e...@meteoritesusa.com>
To: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
Sent: Sat, August 21, 2010 12:15:39 PM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] WAS Cyanobacteria in meteorites? NOW: Life in
Meteorites

Perhaps... But, are you referring to the "Orgueil" meteorite claim of fossilized
bacteria, Murchison, or the whole claim of fossilized microbial life in
meteorites all together?

We already know that microbial life can survive in space. The question is for
how long.

The conclusion sounds accurate enough to say...

Plausible: Life is not restricted to Earth, nor is there evidence that says
empirically that life could NOT survive in the harshness of space. In fact there
is more evidence that suggested it's probable than not.

Based on the fact that it has already been observed that life can survive in
space without the insulative protection that asteroid, meteoroid, or ejecta
material could provide. Look at this:
http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/1998/ast01sep98_1/#anchor179666


Granted that's only 2.6 years, and we brought it back to Earth. What's to say it
wouldn't have survived in the camera longer if left alone, or if it were
cocooned within the safe confines of a meteoroid or asteroid that it couldn't
survive for millions of years.

There's an interesting article on survival of microbes in space in the Journal
of Cosmology titled "Microbial Survival Mechanisms and the Interplanetary
Transfer of Life Through Space."
http://journalofcosmology.com/Panspermia9.html

And the Plausibility of Martian Microbes - Which was posted/linked to on the
Met-List in 2004
http://www.mail-archive.com/meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com/msg21972.html
Original Article:
http://www.astrobio.net/pressrelease/941/plausibility-of-martian-microbes

Also good reads from LPI, NASA, and Astrobiology Magazine.

Fossil Life in ALH 84001?
http://www.lpi.usra.edu/lpi/meteorites/life.html

Evidence of Ancient Martian Life in Meteorite ALH84001?
http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/planetary/marslife.html

And these articles on extremophiles and other extreme life propagating environs:
http://www.astrobio.net/hottopic_origins_extremelife.php

The evidence of life transfer from reputable sources is growing.

The more we learn about meteorites the more we realize that they are the key to
understanding everything.

Regards,
Eric




On 8/21/2010 10:18 AM, Charles O'Dale wrote:
Apparently this is a hoax, sorry about that guys !!  : (

Chuck
http://ottawa-rasc.ca/wiki/index.php?title=Odale-Articles



----- Forwarded Message ----

From: Charles O'Dale<codale0...@rogers.com>
To: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
Sent: Fri, August 20, 2010 8:35:04 AM
Subject: Cyanobacteria in meteorites?

http://www.panspermia.org/hoover4.htm


______________________________________________
Visit the Archives at
http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


______________________________________________
Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list

______________________________________________
Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list

______________________________________________
Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list

Reply via email to