Hi Bob & list: I will caution you on the possible loss of valuable data on the resampling the photos to too small a size. We have seen as time goes by, the available bandwidth and storage capacity increases, and the 300 x 250 images will be vaguely reminicent of the 320 x 240 videos you skip over on Youtube. We don't need 5 Mb image files, but some happy medium would be nice. Please don't resize the images to a less than useful size.
I have looked at 300, 480, 640, 800 and 1024 pixel long dimension images and 640 to 800 are the minimum I would resample things down to. I thank the efforts to put up the EOM and it is a great reference. Murray Paulson On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 9:13 AM, bcmeteorites <bcmeteori...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi All, > I will also add that one of the features we built into the EoM is that when > an image is > submitted that it automatically is resized to not consume a large amount of > band width; if > someone posts an image that has not been resized (many are 5mb and larger) it > is reduced to > around 300 x 250 pixels to help with not only size of data base but also to > allow picture to > load faster when you select to view full size. > > Glad that everyone is enjoying the EoM and it is with all the images it is > becoming a solid > data base for visual reference. > Thanks to everyone for some of their outstanding images they have shared. > > Best Regards, > Bob Falls > IMCA Board of Director #2413 > EoM Administrator > ______________________________________________ Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html Meteorite-list mailing list Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
