Greg S, You now have as much information as i do. that was my point. Carl -- Carl or Debbie Esparza Meteoritemax
---- Thunder Stone <stanleygr...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > Carl: > > Ok > > What is the TKW of this new lithology? > > Do you have a Map of where it's been found? > > Do you have any documentation at all?? > > Greg S. > > ---------------------------------------- > > Date: Mon, 9 May 2011 15:05:10 -0400 > > From: cdtuc...@cox.net > > To: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com; star_wars_collec...@yahoo.com > > Subject: [meteorite-list] Mifflin second lithology > > > > List, > > I am told that I need to add a few details to my defense of selling this > > possible second (odd) looking lithology of Mifflin. > > I must admit that I am a bit shocked how quick some people are to be judge > > , jury and executioner all in one swift swoop. > > > > Way back when this first started selling I received a phone call out of the > > blue from John Helm. he informed me that he had purchased a slice of > > mifflin from Greg C.and Greg gave him my number. > > I was a bit surprised because the reason I had partnered with Greg is > > because he being a big dealer he would be able to get top dollar for our > > material. Whereas on eBay I get chump change for the meteorites I sell. You > > see Greg has a web site to sell from and I don't. This was to be a win win > > situation. > > Back to the call; John informed me that he was suspicious of his recent > > acquisition from Greg. I told John that this was the first I'd heard of > > this and I had never seen any of the material once cut by Greg. I told John > > i would get right back with him. > > So, I called Greg and he had already looked into this between the time John > > called him and me. Greg assured me that Dave Gheesling was already aware of > > this second lithology and it was definitely being found at Mifflin > > strewnfield. > > needless to say I was very happy this was so quickly resolved. > > I immediately called John back and explained to him that this is not only > > good mifflin material but, may end up actually being worth more than the > > other lithology because it appears to be more rare, > > John invited me to hunt with him if I ever get up to Wisconsin and we hung > > up friends. > > It was not until a few weeks ago that Jason hit me with this bomb. > > I explained to Jason all of this and he chose not to agree with the > > situation. > > As I said before. Jason is entitled to his opinion but I think he > > overstepped his boundaries before this ends up getting resolved. > > Obviously more testing is going to have to be done and Dirk Ross has > > offered to have the testing done. I just need to get a piece of this second > > lithology and send it to him in Japan. > > So, in the mean time people please relax and as was the case with NWA 5400 > > pairings. Be patient. That one took some special care as well but turned > > out to be just fine. I certainly hope this turns out to be from the same > > fall but we need the science to be sure. One thing is certain. There has > > been no scam commited here and worse case is that everyone will get their > > money back. > > Thank you. > > Carl > > -- > > Carl or Debbie Esparza > > Meteoritemax > > ______________________________________________ > > Visit the Archives at > > http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html > > Meteorite-list mailing list > > Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com > > http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list > > ______________________________________________ Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html Meteorite-list mailing list Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
