Greg S,
You now have as much information as i do. that was my point.
Carl
--
Carl or Debbie Esparza
Meteoritemax


---- Thunder Stone <stanleygr...@hotmail.com> wrote: 
> 
> Carl:
>  
> Ok
>  
> What is the TKW of this new lithology?
>  
> Do you have a Map of where it's been found?
>  
> Do you have any documentation at all??
>  
> Greg S.
> 
> ----------------------------------------
> > Date: Mon, 9 May 2011 15:05:10 -0400
> > From: cdtuc...@cox.net
> > To: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com; star_wars_collec...@yahoo.com
> > Subject: [meteorite-list] Mifflin second lithology
> >
> > List,
> > I am told that I need to add a few details to my defense of selling this 
> > possible second (odd) looking lithology of Mifflin.
> > I must admit that I am a bit shocked how quick some people are to be judge 
> > , jury and executioner all in one swift swoop.
> >
> > Way back when this first started selling I received a phone call out of the 
> > blue from John Helm. he informed me that he had purchased a slice of 
> > mifflin from Greg C.and Greg gave him my number.
> > I was a bit surprised because the reason I had partnered with Greg is 
> > because he being a big dealer he would be able to get top dollar for our 
> > material. Whereas on eBay I get chump change for the meteorites I sell. You 
> > see Greg has a web site to sell from and I don't. This was to be a win win 
> > situation.
> > Back to the call; John informed me that he was suspicious of his recent 
> > acquisition from Greg. I told John that this was the first I'd heard of 
> > this and I had never seen any of the material once cut by Greg. I told John 
> > i would get right back with him.
> > So, I called Greg and he had already looked into this between the time John 
> > called him and me. Greg assured me that Dave Gheesling was already aware of 
> > this second lithology and it was definitely being found at Mifflin 
> > strewnfield.
> > needless to say I was very happy this was so quickly resolved.
> > I immediately called John back and explained to him that this is not only 
> > good mifflin material but, may end up actually being worth more than the 
> > other lithology because it appears to be more rare,
> > John invited me to hunt with him if I ever get up to Wisconsin and we hung 
> > up friends.
> > It was not until a few weeks ago that Jason hit me with this bomb.
> > I explained to Jason all of this and he chose not to agree with the 
> > situation.
> > As I said before. Jason is entitled to his opinion but I think he 
> > overstepped his boundaries before this ends up getting resolved.
> > Obviously more testing is going to have to be done and Dirk Ross has 
> > offered to have the testing done. I just need to get a piece of this second 
> > lithology and send it to him in Japan.
> > So, in the mean time people please relax and as was the case with NWA 5400 
> > pairings. Be patient. That one took some special care as well but turned 
> > out to be just fine. I certainly hope this turns out to be from the same 
> > fall but we need the science to be sure. One thing is certain. There has 
> > been no scam commited here and worse case is that everyone will get their 
> > money back.
> > Thank you.
> > Carl
> > --
> > Carl or Debbie Esparza
> > Meteoritemax
> > ______________________________________________
> > Visit the Archives at 
> > http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
> > Meteorite-list mailing list
> > Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
> > http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list                     
> >                   

______________________________________________
Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list

Reply via email to