I agree with this scope. Pierrick
> > IMHO I see no reason to focus only on client-based or network-based > solutions. FWIW the DMM solution space: > > o is incremental to an existing IETF mobility protocol, be that client-, > network- or even transport-based. > o or alternatively may not depend on a specific mobility protocol at all > i.e. non-anchored solution is also in scope. > o solution is backward compatible in a sense that if a host or a network > does not support DMM, nothing breaks. > o focuses on IPv6 because anything IPv4 is just NAT-games. > > - Jouni > _______________________________________________ MEXT mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext
