Dear Madam,   The PWDEA act was enacted in year 1995.
     Though psycho social disabled due to Mental illness was included in the 
act of 1995, the bureaucracy of the Social Justice Ministry could get the scale 
for the evaluation of percentage of this  disability formulated only  in the 
year 2002. This also only due to the ERAWADI death tragedy because under 
Ms.Menaka Gandhi’s stewardship of the Ministry and under the Secretary  Gowri 
Chatterjee IAS ;street dogs were given more importance and  more funds 
allocated than Disabled due to Mental illness. 
    An Amendment Committee, headed by Dr. Amita Dhanda, ( Mother of Mental 
health laws)was appointed by the Government within three years of the 
notification of the Act of 1995. The Committee comprised of Shri S.K. Rungta, 
Merry Barua, J.P. Gadkari, Aloka Guha, R. Ramachandran,
 Dr. D.K. Menon and Surrender Saini. This Committee submitted its report in 
1999 basically to include” Autism” in the PWDEA act 1995 because this group of 
activists did not want “Autism” to be part of “”Mental illness disabled”” nor 
“mental retarded” disabled though DSMIV and ICD 10 said otherwise. So this 
committee created an entirely different yardstick to measure disabled due to 
Mental illness which also satisfied  the powerful Mental retarded group and 
also the Psychiatrists who support them.This gave names of Psychiatric illness 
like Schizophrenia,Manic depression,OCD etc instead of using the WHODASS scale 
available at that time to measure Psychiatric disability.It is similar to 
saying blindness to be measured by Cataract,Glaucoma,retinal detachment etc etc 
or Orthopaedic handicapped as chandra surcoma,clubfeet,frostbite,etc etc.But 
then the main focus of this committee was to satisfy the Autism lobby to be 
included in PWDEA
 act separately from ICD 10 definition. though they were already part of the 
National trust act 1998. This made the psychiatric disabled as Disabled within 
the overall disabled community and most of them begging without knowing how to 
beg.Now a days one doesnot see blind,lame beggars in the beggar homes.
  I find the new amendment committee is resurrecting this mothballed 1999 
report of the Amendment committee which was made under the NDA regime of 
Ms.Menaka Gandhi. When the IDEAS scale is already notified by the MOSJE, what 
is the need for names of psychiatric illnesses? A Schizophrenic may be getting 
his Nobel like Prof Nash while a severely depressed may not even get out of his 
bed.So the yardstick should be like any other disability and percentage which 
measures impairment or on the basis of activity limitation not names of 
illnesses.
  Also from 1995 (PWDEA act)and from 1998 when RCI act was enacted both these 
organisations have NOT i repeat NOT bothered to ENUMERATE seperately disabled 
due to Psychiatric illness. Their numbers are clubbed in the “MENTAL 
HANDICAPPED” GROUP while the Benefits went EXCLUSIVELY TO “Mental retarded” 
group as you can see from the money spent on INDIVIDUAL DISABILITIES from the 
year 1995 till 2010. and also new institutions established by RCI
   Even today neither the RCI nor the Ministry of SJE has asked NSS to 
enumerate seperately the Psychiatric disabled to find the numbers on which the 
funds of the Ministry are allotted. Please see MOSJE website  for the numbers 
of disabled. I have copy pasted it here.   Disability-wiseDisability-wise 
number of persons with disabilities in the country as per the Census-2001S. 
NoState/UTVisual disabilitySpeech disabilityHearing disabilityLocomotor 
disabilityMental disabilityTotal











   RCI has not even started an institution exclusively  for the disabled due to 
psychiatric Disability  like it has done for all other SIX  DISABILITIES.
  When I read the consensus document I find the arm of the Amendment committee 
of 1999 under Ms.Menaka Gandhi  and not a fresh approach which will give 
justice to those who were out of the purview of the Ministry’s funding from 
1995.When cross disability activists ask for carry forward of disability quota 
in jobs, the same principle should apply in case of Psycho social disabled as 
far as fund allocation is concerned. The Menaka Gandhi led bureaucracy even 
constituted a disability commission under Shri Javed Abidi which had 5 members 
from only the above 5 disabilities  thus disabling a section of the disabled 
community.Mercifully it was abolished by the new UPA government.
   Madam the law which you will enact will be implemented by the bureaucracy of 
the MOSJE ( like Secys,Directors,section officers,desk officers and assistants) 
and it follows the Government procedures and not loftier Human rights ideas of 
UNCRPD .The consensus paper is not clear about the agency which will do the 
enumeration like whether it will be Census commissioner or NSS or some other 
agency?With Adhar coming into play, it will be worthwhile to have UID issued 
with atleast the existing disabilities with existing act.       Hope when you 
frame the new law, you will take into account some of these.concerns.    with 
kind regards.  "Greatness lies not in never falling but in rising everytime we 
fall"Captain Johann samuhanand,  BANGALORE  INDIA91 80  
42023252   www.captainjohann.blogspot.com 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Mental Health Advocacy (News 'N Views) India" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/MhaNewsViewsIndia?hl=en
-------------
Affiliated Groups :  MENTAL HEALTH ADVOCACY INDIA
[email protected]
Discussions on mental health law / policy / plan monitoring / human rights etc 
[email protected]
India-specific news and views related to mental health
[email protected]
Information and support to carers of people with mental health issues
[email protected]
Mutual support and sharing of experiential knowledge, skills and social 
learning amongst peers

Reply via email to