17-Dec-2012
 
Police seek court’s nod to take his buccal swabs 
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM : The city police on Tuesday said they suspected that one 
Suresh Babu, a 38-year-old inpatient, was responsible for the murder of a 
60-year-old Andhra Pradesh native, tentatively identified as Venkateshappa, at 
the State Mental Health Centre (SMHC) here on December 4. 
A magistrate court had referred Venkateshappa to the SMHC after the police 
arrested him near Kilimanoor on December 2 on the charge of behaving violently 
in public. Investigators said that Venkateshappa and Suresh Babu, a native of 
Thirupuram near Poovar, were confined in the same cell. Hospital janitors found 
Venkateshappa dead on December 4 afternoon. The SMHC authorities reported the 
matter to the local police and transferred the body to the Medical College 
Hospital mortuary. 
The police initially reported the incident as a case of suspicious death. A 
subsequent forensic examination confirmed murder. Injuries on neck and head had 
caused his death. 
Satnam’s case The police said Venkateshappa’s death could not be compared to 
the custodial death of a law student from Bihar, Satnam Singh, at the same 
institution early this year. The Crime Branch, which probed Satnam Singh’s 
murder, had arraigned six persons, including hospital staff, as accused in the 
case. 
It had blamed the illegal practice of using “cured” patients, mostly convicts 
or under-trials, to subdue violent inmates as the reason for Satnam’s death. In 
comparison, the police said, so far, no SMHC staff had been found to have any 
role in Venkateshappa’s murder. 
The prime suspect in the case, Suresh Kumar, had been reported missing from his 
house at Poovar for over a month. 
A magistrate court had sent him to the SMHC after the Museum police detained 
him on the charge of showing aggression in public. His wife told the police 
that Suresh, a manual labourer, had been under psychiatric care for long. He 
was often sleepless but rarely violent, according to her. The police said they 
had sought the court’s permission to take “buccal swabs”, from the cheek of the 
suspect, to extract his DNA for comparison with the “debris”, (skin, hair, 
blood, etc.), collected from the body of the victim, particularly his 
fingernails. Forensic pathologists, who conducted the post-mortem examination 
on Venkateshappa’s body, told the police that multiple actions of aggression 
and defence had preceded his death. 
They have ruled out the use of any weapon or blunt instrument in the murder. 
The police would question the doctors and staff at the SMHC as part of their 
investigation on Monday. Circle Inspector, Peroorkada, R. Pratapan, headed the 
investigation. 
The State police have contacted their counterparts in Karnataka and Andhra 
Pradesh to locate Venkateshappa’s address. So far, no one has claimed his body. 
http://www.thehindu.com/news/cities/Thiruvananthapuram/smhc-murder-suspicion-falls-on-cellmate/article4209135.ece
   17-Dec-2012
 A disgrace to Kerala, says expert 
KOLLAM : Roy Abraham Kallivayalil, national president of the Indian Psychiatric 
Society, has called for urgent intervention of Chief Minister Oommen Chandy in 
the state of affairs of the State Mental Health Centre in Thiruvananthapuram 
following the death of two inmates in four months. Dr. Abraham told The Hindu 
on Sunday that the murders had brought disgrace to Kerala. A 64-year-old 
mentally challenged man, identified as Venkateshappa, was killed at the SMHC on 
December 4. In similar circumstances, Satnam Singh Mann was killed in August 
this year. 
Dr. Abraham said Venkateshappa’s murder was a crime against humanity. The 
forensic ward of SMHC, where Venkateshappa was admitted, had only 24 cells. 
Each cell would have at least 60 to 65 patients. Often, these patients became 
violent. 
Dr. Abraham said the failure of the authorities to post enough personnel to 
supervise the ward was criminal negligence. This meant that they gave little 
value to patients’ lives. The State had taken custody of Venkateshappa and it 
was duty-bound to protect him. Instead of knee-jerk reactions such as 
transferring the hospital superintendent, committed efforts with long-term 
goals, must be made, he said.

  Says there are few supervisors at mental centre ‘It was duty of the State to 
protect victim’  



                                          

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Mental Health Advocacy (News 'N Views) India" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/MhaNewsViewsIndia?hl=en
-------------
Affiliated Groups :  MENTAL HEALTH ADVOCACY INDIA
[email protected]
Discussions on mental health law / policy / plan monitoring / human rights etc 
[email protected]
India-specific news and views related to mental health
[email protected]
Information and support to carers of people with mental health issues
[email protected]
Mutual support and sharing of experiential knowledge, skills and social 
learning amongst peers

Reply via email to