23-Dec-2012
Mohamed Imranullah S.
Judges begin cleansing, close down frivolous petitions
MADURAI : If at all there is one jurisdiction that is sought to be invoked the 
most for frivolous reasons in the Madras High Court Bench here, it is the 
jurisdiction to issue a writ of habeas corpus. But since last month, a Division 
Bench of Justice M. Jaichandren and Justice S. Nagamuthu had begun the process 
of closing down all such silly cases.
Though a litigant could file a habeas corpus petition (HCP) only to seek the 
release of an individual from the illegal custody of another person, most of 
the HCPs filed in the court were by parents whose young children had eloped on 
their own volition following a love affair or by people whose spouses had 
eloped with someone else or to find out students who had run away from home.
The court hall where the HCPs are heard would always be swarmed by men, women 
and children wailing, yelling and crying. They sometimes go beyond the control 
of the court staff and the police. Not finding any justification in keeping 
such cases pending for years together, the Division Bench has been closing them 
down after recording undertakings given by police to pursue the matters in 
accordance with law.
Nevertheless, amidst the din, there have also been cases where the Bench had 
come to the rescue of some people really in need of help. One such case was 
relating to 43-year-old S. Mahalakshmi (43), a mentally challenged person. The 
spinster’s sister, S. Gandhi, had filed a HCP in the court after the former 
went missing from her house here on September 24.
The petitioner had approached the court after a complaint lodged with the South 
Gate police station here did not evoke any response. But immediately after the 
filing of the case, the police produced Ms. Mahalakshmi along with her brother 
S. Nagasundaram before the two judges.
However, the petitioner Ms. Gandhi did not come to court citing illness.After 
interacting with the woman for a while in open court, the judges came to a 
conclusion that she was indeed mentally unstable. “For certain questions we 
asked, Mahalakshmi gave totally irrelevant and inconsistent answers. We are 
prima facie convinced that Mahalakshmi is mentally ill and she needs 
treatment,” the judges wrote in their order.
They also suggested her brother to get the woman treated at the Institute of 
Mental Health in Kilpauk, Chennai.
But he expressed his inability to do so for want of financial wherewithal. 
Hence, the court directed the Dean of Government Rajaji Hospital here to 
provide treatment to the woman free of cost by admitting her as an inpatient, 
if required.
Handing over the custody of the woman to her brother, the judges made clear 
that her entire medical expenditure, including cost of medicines, should be 
borne by the State government.
In another HCP, filed by the grandson of a 92-year-old man, Marutha Pillai, who 
was missing since 2003, the court directed the Tiruchi city police to expedite 
the process of tracing him out.
http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/tp-tamilnadu/the-good-bad-and-ugly-of-habeas-corpus-jurisdiction/article4230969.ece
 
  
                                          

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Mental Health Advocacy (News 'N Views) India" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/MhaNewsViewsIndia?hl=en
-------------
Affiliated Groups :  MENTAL HEALTH ADVOCACY INDIA
[email protected]
Discussions on mental health law / policy / plan monitoring / human rights etc 
[email protected]
India-specific news and views related to mental health
[email protected]
Information and support to carers of people with mental health issues
[email protected]
Mutual support and sharing of experiential knowledge, skills and social 
learning amongst peers

Reply via email to