Hullo again,

Thank you for sharing your thoughts Ketan, Shubhanghi, Dhananjay, Harish,
Murali, Smita, Pankaj, Bhargav and Shankar.

Let's leave the article and contentious terms like *'inclusive school'
'special school' *and* 'mainstream school'* aside.
Let's even leave what to do on the Supreme Court front aside for now.

What can we all agree on? Whatever we propose needs to have the
stakeholders' backing, and as of now the specifics and stances are getting
in the way leading to a very lukewarm, half-hearted response. Surely we can
do better?

*Is there anyone who disagrees with the anti-segregation spirit of the
statement below (extract): *

To be a part and not apart
> Pulling together spaces, services, and resources so that children of a
> locality (same-same) can share the same space, some of the time when
> pursuing valid (but different) learning pathways based on students needs.
>  Same-Same but Different 'Together Scapes'
>
> The 'impossible to think'
> <http://www.livelaw.in/sc-deliberates-creation-special-schools-children-special-needs-read-order/>
> observation of the supreme court of India, the apex court, has taken us
> back by a century and a half. The observation has brushed under the carpet
> the efforts and hard work of the disability movement for an inclusive
> community that respects, protects and promotes all human rights
> and fundamental freedoms for all persons with disability on an equal
> basis with others everywhere with​ ​due ​ ​respect ​ ​to​ ​individual ​ ​
> choices ​ ​and​ ​preferences.
> *What​ ​do​ ​we ​ ​want​ ​as ​ ​persons ​ ​with ​ ​disabilities?*
>
>    - We ​ ​want ​ ​our​ ​choices ​ ​and​ ​preferences ​ ​to​ ​be ​ ​
>    recognised,​ ​respected​ ​and​ ​protected.
>
>
>    - We ​ ​want ​ ​to​ ​be ​ ​recognised​ ​as ​ ​equal ​ ​players ​ ​in​ ​
>    the ​ ​community.
>
>
>    - We ​ ​want ​ ​that ​ ​our​ ​full ​ ​and​ ​effective ​ ​participation​
>    ​everywhere ​ ​is ​ ​ensured.
>
>
>    - We ​ ​do​ ​not ​ ​want ​ ​to​ ​be ​ ​discriminated​ ​on​ ​the ​ ​
>    grounds ​ ​of​ ​disability.
>
>
>    - *We *want full accessibility not just physical infrastructure but
>    also to information and communication,​ ​products ​ ​and​ ​services ​ ​
>    and​ ​personal ​ ​mobility.
>
>
>    - We ​ ​want ​ ​a ​ ​range ​ ​of​ ​options ​ ​so​ ​that ​ ​education​ ​
>    becomes ​ ​a ​ ​reality​ ​for​ ​all ​ ​of​ ​us.
>
>
>    - We ​ ​do​ ​not ​ ​want ​ ​our​ ​education​ ​to​ ​be ​ ​a ​ ​welfare ​
>    ​issue ​ ​but ​ ​a ​ ​Human​ ​Resource ​ ​Development ​ ​issue.
>
>
>    - We ​ ​do​ ​not ​ ​want ​ ​to​ ​be ​ ​isolated​ ​and​ ​segregated
>
>
>    - We ​ ​do​ ​not ​ ​want ​ ​to​ ​be ​ ​removed​ ​from ​ ​our​ ​
>    communities.
>
> *Our ​ ​**call *
>
> Please do not think or make decisions for us. We want to be included on
> an equal basis with others with our choices and preferences intact. We make
> a call to ensure equal enjoyment of this fundamental right to education
> with the right to equality of opportunities and non-discrimination as ​ ​
> its ​ ​principles.
>
---


On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 11:18 AM, Vaishnavi Jayakumar <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi everyone,
>
> Not great news so far on the separate school case.
>
> Some of us attempted an impleadment in WP C 132/2016, but were turned down
> orally by Supreme Court judges who did not even receive the written
> submission.
>
> This case seems to have taken an inexplicable trajectory in not only
> ignoring current disability legislation priorities but rejecting the spirit
> of the RTE as well. Media has reported of the submissions of the ministry
> of HRD on the necessity to include and not isolate, but the court seems to
> have forged on nevertheless.
>
> With the 'impossible to think' statement on a case that was initiated to
> fill vacancies for special educators, it is no longer clear whether the
> Court intends to order the provision of  Government-run special schools to
> provide choice  or whether it intends to limit the choice of students to
> some disabilities only to separate schools.
>
> Yes, there are reservations within the sector on ideals vs ground reality,
> inclusive vs special schools. However given the alarming recent
> developments there is cause to worry that however well-intended, we may be
> going backwards as far as 'social distance' is concerned.
>
> *The court's next hearing is on 4th December.*
>
> *What would the sector like to do?*
>
> The background is available at bit.ly/end-edpartheid
> The court records are available at bit.ly/edpartheid
> The blog with advocacy material is at end-edpartheid.tumblr.com
>
>
> *This is the statement that we feel most of us can agree on :*
>
> “​It​ ​is ​ ​impossible ​ ​to ​ ​think ​ ​that​ ​the ​ ​children ​ ​who ​
>> ​are ​ ​disabled ​ ​or ​ ​suffer ​ ​from ​ ​any ​ ​kind of​ ​disability ​
>> ​or ​ ​who ​ ​are ​ ​mentally ​ ​challenged ​ ​can ​ ​be ​ ​included ​ ​in
>> ​ ​the ​ ​mainstream schools ​ ​for ​ ​getting ​ ​education”-​ ​​  
>> WP(C)No.132/16
>> ​ ​etc.
>
>
> This observation of the supreme court of India, the apex court, has taken
> us back by a century and a half. The observation has brushed under the
> carpet the efforts and hard work of the disability movement for an
> inclusive community that respects, protects and promotes all human rights
> and fundamental freedoms for all persons with disability on an equal basis
> with others everywhere with​ ​due ​ ​respect ​ ​to​ ​individual ​ ​choices
> ​ ​and​ ​preferences.
>
> *Background*
>
> The Nation has recognised education as a fundamental right under Article
> 21 A of the Constitution and has adopted The Right to Free and compulsory
> Elementary Education for all Children Act 20091. This Act applies to all
> children without any distinction on the grounds of human diversities or
> social differences. The Act has respected the choices of children
> with disabilities.
>
> The Rights of persons with disabilities Act 20162 has created an
> obligation upon the appropriate Governments to ensure quality, inclusive
> education for all children with disabilities under the Sections 16 & 17 of
> Chapter III. The Act has recognised vide section 2(h) that any
> distinction, restriction​ ​and​ ​exclusion​ ​on​ ​the ​ ​ground​ ​of​ ​
> disability​ ​would​ ​amount ​ ​to​ ​discrimination.
>
> The objective of the Act is to implement UNCRPD3 in our country. UNCRPD
> obligates the state to ensure inclusive education for all children with
> disabilities on an equal basis with others with due consideration to the
> Deaf culture vide its Article 24 and promotes Equality
> and Non-Discrimination, Accessibility, Equality of Opportunity and respect
> for evolving capacity of children​ ​with​ ​disabilities ​ ​as ​ ​the ​ 
> ​general
> ​ ​principles ​ ​vide ​ ​Article ​ ​3​ ​of​ ​the ​ ​Convention.
>
> *What​ ​do​ ​we ​ ​want​ ​as ​ ​persons ​ ​with ​ ​disabilities?*
>
>
>    - We ​ ​want ​ ​our​ ​choices ​ ​and​ ​preferences ​ ​to​ ​be ​ ​
>    recognised,​ ​respected​ ​and​ ​protected.
>    - We ​ ​want ​ ​to​ ​be ​ ​recognised​ ​as ​ ​equal ​ ​players ​ ​in​ ​the
>    ​ ​community.
>    - We ​ ​want ​ ​that ​ ​our​ ​full ​ ​and​ ​effective ​ ​participation​
>    ​everywhere ​ ​is ​ ​ensured.
>    - We ​ ​do​ ​not ​ ​want ​ ​to​ ​be ​ ​discriminated​ ​on​ ​the ​ ​grounds
>    ​ ​of​ ​disability.
>    - *We *want full accessibility not just physical infrastructure but
>    also to information and communication,​ ​products ​ ​and​ ​services ​ ​
>    and​ ​personal ​ ​mobility.
>    - We ​ ​want ​ ​a ​ ​range ​ ​of​ ​options ​ ​so​ ​that ​ ​education​ 
> ​becomes
>    ​ ​a ​ ​reality​ ​for​ ​all ​ ​of​ ​us.
>    - We ​ ​do​ ​not ​ ​want ​ ​our​ ​education​ ​to​ ​be ​ ​a ​ ​welfare ​
>    ​issue ​ ​but ​ ​a ​ ​Human​ ​Resource ​ ​Development ​ ​issue.
>    - We ​ ​do​ ​not ​ ​want ​ ​to​ ​be ​ ​isolated​ ​and​ ​segregated
>    - We ​ ​do​ ​not ​ ​want ​ ​to​ ​be ​ ​removed​ ​from ​ ​our​ ​
>    communities.
>
> *Our ​ ​**call *
>
> Please do not think or make decisions for us. We want to be included on an
> equal basis with others with our choices and preferences intact. We make a
> call to ensure equal enjoyment of this fundamental right to education
> with the right to equality of opportunities and non-discrimination as ​ ​
> its ​ ​principles.
>
> -----------------------------------
> 1 ​ ​http://www.mhrd.gov.in/rte
> 2 ​ ​http://ccdisabilities.nic.in/page.php?s=reg&t=def&p=RPwDAct
> 3  https://www.un.org/development/desa/disabilities/conventi
> on-on-the-rights-of-persons-with-disabilities.html
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Mental Health Advocacy (News 'N Views) India" group.
-------------
Affiliated Groups :  MENTAL HEALTH ADVOCACY INDIA
[email protected]
Discussions on mental health law / policy / plan monitoring / human rights etc 
[email protected]
India-specific news and views related to mental health
[email protected]
Information and support to carers of people with mental health issues
[email protected]
Mutual support and sharing of experiential knowledge, skills and social 
learning amongst peers
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Mental Health Advocacy (News 'N Views) India" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/MhaNewsViewsIndia.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/MhaNewsViewsIndia/CAN7%2BzvpwxtKuj%3DnTi0SthoE4f8svJ%3D8nLH0GWNAZY96cKUqktA%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to