On July 25, 2003 at 12:48, "Scott Noone" wrote: > Cool, this is sort of what I thought. My first instinct was your first > suggestion, just modify the generated index into something easily parsed and > run through it collapsing the threads into one file. Grossly inefficient, > but lacking an as easy alternative I think it should be acceptable for what > I'm shooting for.
You could optimize things by caching the special index of the previous update so it can be "diffed" against the new special index. Therefore, you would only need to update discussion pages that need changing vs regenerating them all. --ewh --------------------------------------------------------------------- To sign-off this list, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message text UNSUBSCRIBE MHONARC-USERS
