Am Montag, 12. Mai 2008 00:10 schrieb Karl Weber: > Hi, > Hi Per, > > I am no ASN.1 expert, so I cannot tell whether the following is an error, > but according to my understanding of the X.208 I suppose so. >
My post was a little rash. SMIv2 as specified in rfc2578 uses some features, that are not in accordance with Recommendation X.208. [...] > Mibble creates a VALUE-SYMBOL for every >identifier< (as it is called in > section 14.1 of the X.208 Recommendation) explicitly listed in the SYNTAX > of the type definition of RowStatus. Furthermore, it adds a compound > constraint, restricting the value set of the RowStatus type to the values > listed, thus effectively creating a subtype of INTEGER. Is this correct? > -- Yes, according to the 2nd paragraph in section 7.1.1 in rfc2578, but -- no according to X.208. Since the relevant standard here is rfc2578, the final answer is yes. Before my next post, I will try to do a complete survey of the relevant standards documents. -Karl _______________________________________________ Mibble-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/mibble-users
