Hi Karel, thanks for you answer. Actually I am more interested in ARM cross compiling than in footprint (memory) evaluation. Don't you encounter any problem on Mico cross compilation ? I called the configure script $./configure --host=x86-linux --target=arm-linux and the C++ compiler seems not to be changed in the generated makefiles. So I exported environement variables CC=<my-arm-c-compiler> and CXX=<my-arm-c++-compiler> but nothing better. Could you give me your configuration command for Mico compilation/installation ?
At least you told me that I should be able to cross compile Mico for ARM target and that's good for me. Best regards. Thomas DERIVE On Jan 2, 2008 9:50 PM, Karel Gardas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > personally speaking, I've not used MICO on ARM11, but on ARM9 in the > past. What footprint exactly do you have in mind? Memory or disk? For > disk footprint after a bit of hacking you are able to get to 1/2 of the > library size IIRC. I've not evaluated memory footprint changes at that > time. > > Cheers, > Karel > -- > Karel Gardas [EMAIL PROTECTED] > ObjectSecurity Ltd. http://www.objectsecurity.com > --- > Need experienced, fast, reliable technical MICO support? > ---> http://www.objectsecurity.com/mico_commsup_referral.html <--- > --- > > > Thomas Derive wrote: > > Hi everybody, I'm interested in using Mico on a ARM11 MpCore host. Are > you > > aware on such a use of Mico ? Do you know if mico fooprint has already > been > > evaluated on different hosts and in different configurations ? > > > > Thanks for your advice. And happy new year ! > > > > NB: I'm new in Mico > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Mico-devel mailing list > > Mico-devel@mico.org > > http://www.mico.org/mailman/listinfo/mico-devel >
_______________________________________________ Mico-devel mailing list Mico-devel@mico.org http://www.mico.org/mailman/listinfo/mico-devel
