No, expected output is something like: ### same process: 0.0003 ms per call ### same machine (pipe): 0.121933 ms per call ### same machine (TCP): 0.122933 ms per call ### same machine (UDP): 0.125133 ms per call ### same machine with micod (TCP): 0.122133 ms per call
the problem you see is also observable on FreeBSD. Thanks to MacOS X heritage I would guess you are hit by the same issue. i.e. the problem is in MICO's udp transport, but so far nobody was able to fix it. Cheers, Karel Matthias Ringwald wrote: > Hi > > if I run demo/bench, I get the following output. > > $ [sudo] ./bench > > ### same process: > 0.000733333 ms per call > ### same machine (pipe): > 0.213967 ms per call > ### same machine (TCP): > 0.266633 ms per call > ### same machine (UDP): > Assertion failed: (0), function accept, file transport/udp.cc, line 429. > cannot bind to inet-dgram:vs15.inf.ethz.ch:12123 > ### same machine with micod (TCP): > 0.275467 ms per call > ./bench: line 46: 71587 Abort trap ./server -ORBIIOPAddr > $DADDR $RC > ./bench: line 47: kill: (71587) - No such process > > sudo does not change anything. > > is this ok? or what goes wrong here? > > matthias > > > _______________________________________________ > Mico-devel mailing list > Mico-devel@mico.org > http://www.mico.org/mailman/listinfo/mico-devel > -- Karel Gardas [EMAIL PROTECTED] ObjectSecurity Ltd. http://www.objectsecurity.com _______________________________________________ Mico-devel mailing list Mico-devel@mico.org http://www.mico.org/mailman/listinfo/mico-devel
