On 7/30/06, Simon Cozens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Oh, I've read it all. I'm just of the opinion that following process, collating examples, performing analysis, holding discussion, forming consensus, trialling implementations, reviewing implementations, and issuing specifications is a way to ensure that nothing gets done, ever. The citation process started a year ago. There's still, apparently, nothing I can use today - at least, nothing better than the ad-hocery I just created.
Do you really think that consensus on a difficult topic ilke this is easy? Sure, we all can create ad hoc stuff. The point is to come to some collective aggreement (though see below). I think if you couple my suggested list of properties with Brian's straw man from awhile back, you'll kniow where we are: <http://microformats.org/discuss/mail/microformats-discuss/2006-April/thread.html#3952> I pinged Brian about gettnig back to this a few days ago. He's been swamped with other things, but sid time would open up soon-ish. I should also add for the record that the participants in this discussion were moving toowards consensus after an IRC meetup, but Tantek had rather a different idea of process that left a lot of us frustrated: <http://microformats.org/discuss/mail/microformats-discuss/2006-April/thread.html#3643> Bruce _______________________________________________ microformats-discuss mailing list microformats-discuss@microformats.org http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
