And since an ordered list is, automatically, XOXO, that's why I made the suggestion. But I'll see what others have to say
On 9/19/06, John Allsopp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Stephen, > However, the point remains, is there a real need for a uF over XOXO > for this? I considered XOXO for the list of links, but "XOXO is a simple, open outline format" and I am not sure that this list is an outline. Hence the choice of just a standard list. As suggested elsewhere, an ordered list might really be the best, as all the examples are in fact ordered lists. Thanks john John Allsopp style master :: css editor :: http://westciv.com/style_master blog :: dog or higher :: http://blogs.westciv.com/dog_or_higher WebPatterns :: http://webpatterns.org Web Directions Conference :: Sydney September 28-29 :: http://wd06.com _______________________________________________ microformats-discuss mailing list microformats-discuss@microformats.org http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
-- - Stephen Paul Weber, Amateur Writer <http://www.awriterz.org> MSN/GTalk/Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ICQ/AIM: 103332966 NSA: [EMAIL PROTECTED] BLOG: http://singpolyma-tech.blogspot.com/ _______________________________________________ microformats-discuss mailing list microformats-discuss@microformats.org http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
