>> Wow. At 1.5MB of documentation, that's pretty much the antithesis of a microformat.
Holy $h1t! Maybe we should call that one a "Macroformat?" Hehe. ;) -Mike -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott Reynen Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2006 5:21 PM To: Microformats Discuss Subject: Re: [uf-discuss] new standard for product information On Oct 12, 2006, at 3:49 PM, Guillaume Lebleu wrote: > I think microformats would probably help adoption with the less > sophisticated (smaller) retailers quickly, but would not satisfy all > the business needs of more sophisticated manufacturers. I agree. > See the ARTS data model http://www.nrf-arts.org/xml_dictionary_5/ > XMLDictionary-NonMembers.html. Wow. At 1.5MB of documentation, that's pretty much the antithesis of a microformat. But if it gains any traction, the individual parts my be useful to look at for more specific microformats. For example, here's what they're doing with currency: http://www.nrf-arts.org/xml_dictionary_5/XMLDictionary- NonMembers.html#Currency Peace, Scott _______________________________________________ microformats-discuss mailing list microformats-discuss@microformats.org http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss _______________________________________________ microformats-discuss mailing list microformats-discuss@microformats.org http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
