Scott, someone had previously proposed microformats-research. It achieves the same goal as microformats-process and seems to be a little more clear.
-justin ****************** Justin Thorp Contractor - Library of Congress e - [EMAIL PROTECTED] p - 202/707-9541 >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 10/16/06 1:37 PM >>> On Oct 16, 2006, at 12:05 PM, Tantek Çelik wrote: > I'd like to see some suggestions for the name of this new list. > Here is > what I have so far: > * microformats-new (focusing on discussing "new" microformats) > * microformats-research (focusing on the essential, and often > overlooked by > first-time proposers "research" phase(s) in the process) > > What I don't like: > * microformats-propose (it misses the point of the process, and > implies > that there is a desire for microformats proposals - there isn't) > > Other suggestions for a new list name for this purpose? How about microformats-process? That's really what we're talking about with research of new microformats, isn't it? Peace, Scott_______________________________________________ microformats-discuss mailing list microformats-discuss@microformats.org http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss _______________________________________________ microformats-discuss mailing list microformats-discuss@microformats.org http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss