On Dec 29, 2006, at 8:56 AM, Andy Mabbett wrote:
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Chris Casciano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
many people are publishing "NSFW" warnings. So vague as it may
be,
it's apparently communicating something useful on the live web
today.
That's "something useful in a large judeo-christian western
democracy",
then...
What's "safe for work" in China, or Iran?
Is a nude picture of a 17-year old safe for work in Holland? Or the
UK?
I don't think that matters AT ALL to the discussion at hand
On the contrary - it matters a great deal, unless you want uFs to only
codify a sub-set of judeo-christian western behaviours.
This is just silly. The microformat spec wouldn't specify what things
are suitable for work. I could see Chinese-language or Arabic-language
developing their own informal sense of what rel=nsfw means. It's a
tool for content authors to use, nothing more. There's no codifying of
anything.
-Colin
_______________________________________________
microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats-discuss@microformats.org
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
