In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Bob Jonkman quoted PJ Doland: >If people have to categorize HOW something might be considered NSFW >(nudity, language, violence, nudity & language, etc.) it's going to >make them less likely to use the standard in practice.
That's supposition, presented as fact. >As I've said earlier, I think PICS and ICRA failed because of their >complexity. That, too, is no more than an opinion; it's my opinion that they failed because only highly-complex, finley-granular categiorisation can succeed (though I can of course see that that brings with it other problems). [...] >Adoption of this as a general standard could be VERY helpful for wider >adoption of microformats as a whole [...] and that's hyperbole, with no apparent justification. -- Andy Mabbett * Say "NO!" to compulsory ID Cards: <http://www.no2id.net/> * Free Our Data: <http://www.freeourdata.org.uk> * Are you using Microformats, yet: <http://microformats.org/> ? _______________________________________________ microformats-discuss mailing list microformats-discuss@microformats.org http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss