On 03/01/07, Frances Berriman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I might be misunderstanding you, but I think you might be confusing categorisation with tagging (the latter being a method of adding additional context)?
I guess my question was why it was chosen to extract the last part of the URL to signify the tag instead of the contents of the anchor tag. Someone used "<a rel="tag" http://exmaple.com/kid-safe>porn</a>" as an example, but didn't really explain their example further. I just wanted further clarification on the choice other than "it's based off commonly used standards." The problem with using URLs for the tags is that not everyone will have mod_rewrite setup to properly adhere to the current standard, which is why you may have those blogs (such as wordpress) that show up differently. Perhaps something like Ciaran McNulty idea of using the title property to specify that tag name could be looked into? It's seems like an easy and straight-forward way of extracting the information. -Nick _______________________________________________ microformats-discuss mailing list microformats-discuss@microformats.org http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
