Michael McCracken wrote: > Looking at the examples on citation-examples, I find the > following frequencies of marking up a date: > > publication date: 21 > date accessed: 3 > date copyrighted: 1 (from OCLC worldcat online)
Actually, date accessed has at least three more examples: umich ning Google However, they use "retrieved" rather than accessed, although it is the same meaning. > I just added date-accessed to the working straw schema. Great. > Certainly all three are useful, but can we find more examples > for the last two? I'd be more comfortable having a 'date > copyrighted' field in the uf if there was more than one > real-world example on the wiki. What would be the right way to make the "retrieved" and "accessed" labels as synonymous? -j -- Joe Andrieu [EMAIL PROTECTED] +1 (805) 705-8651 _______________________________________________ microformats-discuss mailing list microformats-discuss@microformats.org http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss