On 5/23/07, Maciej Stachowiak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I find it questionable to argue that microformats.org defining semantics for particular classes is generally good, but to assume that W3C or WHATWG defining them is ill-conceived. Note that HTML has always predefined some "rel" values, and this has not stopped microformats from defining other rel values, some of which will be folded back in to the HTML spec.
To me the difference is that Microformats have a system for indicating whether they are in use (although it's not used widely) in the @profile mechanism, whereas anything 'hard coded' into the HTML spec will not be optional. -Ciaran McNulty _______________________________________________ microformats-discuss mailing list microformats-discuss@microformats.org http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
