James Craig wrote:
Paul Wilkins wrote:
From: "Andy Mabbett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I thought we'd decided that empty anchor tag-pairs were bad, from
an accessibility PoV?
Is the object tag to be used instead for the include pattern?
The <object> include pattern has some performance problems, it
would be best to use the anchor include pattern but include some
text indicated the marker that was being included.
In my medicated stupor, I thought that made sense. Let me try it again.
The <object> include pattern has some performance problems (see
<http://microformats.org/wiki/include-pattern-feedback>), so it would
be best to use the anchor include pattern but include some link text
indicating the content that is being included. Such as:
<a href="#sharedcompany" class="include">Widgets, Inc.</a>
_______________________________________________
microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats-discuss@microformats.org
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
