At 12:39 PM -0700 8/5/07, Joe Andrieu wrote:
Could you to provide the evidence that was used to conclude that
Andy failed to adhere to the "be nice" guideline /after/ the
private warning?
You mean besides posting a private message to a public list?
Which is neither reasonable nor professional by any reasonable
standard of online discourse with which I'm familiar.
As other microformats.org administrative issues, it was
also apparently handled in a "secret meeting" in the "back room". I
reviewed the IRC archive where I know many administrators
gather and discuss issues, hoping to find some record of the
discussion. However, the only reference to Andy's banning is the ban
itself:
http://rbach.priv.at/Microformats/IRC/2007-08-02#T165815
Nothing on the wiki. Nothing on the mailing list. Simply a summary
judgment by you.
By the administrators. Scott was simply the administrator who
gave public notice of the action.
Interesting, that-- I always thought secret back-room cabals tried
to keep evidence of their abuses secret, and that people responsible
for shepherding a growing community and doing their best to preserve
it were up front about their actions. How I got those two switched
around I'll never know.
--
Eric A. Meyer ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Principal, Complex Spiral Consulting http://complexspiral.com/
"CSS: The Definitive Guide," "CSS2.0 Programmer's Reference,"
"Eric Meyer on CSS," and more http://meyerweb.com/eric/books/
_______________________________________________
microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats-discuss@microformats.org
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
