On 26 Nov 2007, at 19:49, Paul Wilkins wrote:
On Nov 27, 2007 8:28 AM, Edward O'Connor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ben Ward wrote:
I'd like us to update the wiki to make all references to 'XHTML' and
'X/HTML' or '(X)HTML' into clear 'HTML'[...] Does this seem
worthwhile?
I'm all for it. I'd love to take this even further, and s/XHTML/
HTML/ in
XMDP and XFN, but those ships have sailed.
The only concern that I'd have is that visitors to the site are likely
to think that microformats are an older less worthwhile idea because
of all the HTML references. First impressions can be important, so how
can that be dealt with?
By mentioning ‘XHTML and HTML’ in each first instance, we make clear
that both flavours are compatible, whilst using ‘HTML’ there on reads
as a cleaner abbreviation.
Ben
_______________________________________________
microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats-discuss@microformats.org
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
