I suppose I should have posted this in the mailing list: http://rbach.priv.at/Microformats/IRC/2007-12-06#T192503
-Sarven On 1/7/08, Katrina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Guillaume Lebleu wrote: > > Andy Mabbett wrote: > >> > >> When did you last see a listing of, say, Pizza restaurants that labelled > >> each telephone number as "work"? > >> > >> When did you last see a listing of, say, Pizza restaurants that included > >> the managers' home numbers? > >> > >> > > In that same vein, we could ask: when did you last see a phone number > > not being a work number when both a person's formatted name and > > organization name were present? > > > > So, to avoid the meta discussion and go back to Kat's specific problem > > (she wants to specify a phone as work but without the content containing > > "work" or any of its abbreviations), maybe something that would work > > would be to have an implied 'work' tel type when a fn and an org that > > are both present and a tel type is not present. I believe we could have > > an implied 'voice' type in this case as well. > > > > Sorry in advance if this idea has already been proposed/discussed. > > > > Awesome and Brilliant. > > Thanks Guillaume and Tantek! :)) > > Kat > > _______________________________________________ > microformats-discuss mailing list > microformats-discuss@microformats.org > http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss > _______________________________________________ microformats-discuss mailing list microformats-discuss@microformats.org http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss