>Message: 8 >Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 12:03:30 -0400 >From: Manu Sporny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: [uf-discuss] Microformats and RDFa not as far apart as > previously thought >To: Microformats Discuss <microformats-discuss@microformats.org> >Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>There have been some interesting blog posts by people at the BBC, >Mozilla and W3C about Microformats and RDFa in the past two days. The >first covers BBC's decision to drop support for the abbr-based design >pattern written by Michael Smethurst (who worked with this community on >hAudio among other things): >Removing abbr-based Microformats from BBC >http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/radiolabs/2008/06/removing_microformats_from _bbc.shtml I have come to a similar decision. In my case, I will split the human-readable portion entirely from the microformat portion, and the microformat portion will be entirely styled display:none. That applies to machine-intermediated content. I feel it is unreasonable to ask a non-technical person to produce ISO-format dates/times, so microformats do not produce an acceptable solution at this time for marking up meeting announcements. Charles "Chas" Belov SFMTA Webmaster www.sfmta.com _______________________________________________ microformats-discuss mailing list microformats-discuss@microformats.org http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss