li...@ben-ward.co.uk wrote: > This community very intentionally doesn't try create specifications for > everything. Previous pure-science efforts such as species died because > it fell way outside the area of active interest of most of this > community's participants.
I don't think that's the defining reason (Andy's banning, as Toby stated, is probably the primary reason that the species uF is currently not under development). While I do agree that it's important that this community is careful about what it works on, we shouldn't be exclusive and we shouldn't assume that we know where certain community members want to focus their attention. If a couple of people want to come into the Microformats community to develop their vocabularies, we shouldn't say that there isn't a place for them. I, for one, would be interested to see how a bioformats discussion would evolve *ba-dum-bum* =P. We're talking about the bits and pieces that make us who we are! Allowing us to identify and process that information could help us better understand how we're connected to each other as a species. That seems like a fairly noble endeavor. Ever played around with 23andme.com[1]? Being able to mark up your personal genome on 23andme and have the browser cross-link against SNPedia[2] automatically would be really awesome. In short, we could help them work through some of the more subtle language and vocabulary issues while helping an initiative that could very well benefit the human condition. The discussion may come to nothing, but let's give it a chance before shutting it down prematurely. -- manu [1] https://www.23andme.com/about/ [1] http://www.snpedia.com/index.php/SNPedia -- Manu Sporny President/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. blog: Bitmunk 3.1 Website Launch http://blog.digitalbazaar.com/2009/01/16/bitmunk-3-1-website-launch _______________________________________________ microformats-discuss mailing list microformats-discuss@microformats.org http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss