On Mon, 2010-03-22 at 09:38 -0600, Andrew Jaswa wrote: > Like what? class? id? If I remember correctly microformats where meant > to be portable across all versions* and using non-standard attributes > wouldn't make sense. > > * 4.0+ atleast
The rel- and rev-based microformats (e.g. rel-tag, votelinks, etc) can be used validly as far back as HTML 2.0. But HTML 2.0 didn't include a class attribute, so the bigger microformats can't be used. I think the HTML 3.0 drafts included the class attribute, but HTML 3.0 faltered and never really happened. HTML 3.2 was published as a W3C Recommendation, but didn't include class. (The DTD explicitly mentions it as something that was omitted.) -- Toby A Inkster <mailto:m...@tobyinkster.co.uk> <http://tobyinkster.co.uk> _______________________________________________ microformats-discuss mailing list microformats-discuss@microformats.org http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss