"Generally these are the ones that pre-date the "microformats" movement."
Should that not be documented as part of the philosophy or design? It seems like random naming right now... -Andriy Drozdyuk On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 6:50 PM, Frances Berriman <fberri...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 22 March 2010 21:35, Andriy Drozdyuk <dro...@gmail.com> wrote: >> I thought so, but what about: >> - Rel tags - they could be used for something else - these is no way >> to infer if the rel-tag is beign used in "semantic ways" or not. > But in this case - rel is part of the HTML spec and should be used > correctly. Can't assume any HTML is ever actually used semantically, > beyond recommendation. > >> - Other formats that don't have namespaces, e.g. geo > Generally these are the ones that pre-date the "microformats" movement. > >> - "Design for humans first, machines second" > I'd say the name-space aids humans too. It's much easier for a > developer to spot the usage in amongst their code if the names stand > out amongst their other classes. > >> Sorry - I am just trying to get a jist of where the ideas are coming >> from in these standards, not trying to\ undermine them... > > > Of course - it's good to ask questions :) > > _______________________________________________ > microformats-discuss mailing list > microformats-discuss@microformats.org > http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss > _______________________________________________ microformats-discuss mailing list microformats-discuss@microformats.org http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss