(resent because I messed up with the subject) Hello, thanks for your answers.
The problem most people in the discuss list had, was that you would define relationships to customers and business related entities using a "Friends network". This would most likely hold people back in adoption of using a standard to define those relationships. The link to the previous discussion in discuss: http://microformats.org/discuss/mail/microformats-discuss/2007-January/008327.html and: http://microformats.org/discuss/mail/microformats-discuss/2007-January/008373.html Cheers, Kilian
Hi. I think it's just about a name change since business relationship and "friends" doesn't really fit. So if I got that right, we should add more relationships to XFN and at the same time change the name to reflect the new types of relationships available. While I personally think adding relationships is a good idea, I'm not convinced a name change to XRN is required. - Alex
_______________________________________________ microformats-new mailing list [email protected] http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-new
