On Mon, 2007-10-08 at 11:58 -0400, Manu Sporny wrote: > There are several hAudio issues that seem to have been resolved in the > past several weeks that should be marked as "Resolved". > > PROPOSAL: We close the following issues as each problem seems to have > been addressed. > > hAudio ISSUE #1: image-summary Property is redundant > - PHOTO has been used to replace image-summary in the latest proposal, > reusing a previous Microformat property, which is a Good Thing(tm). > - http://microformats.org/wiki/audio-info-proposal#Photo > > hAudio ISSUE #3: published-date Property is redundant > - PUBLISHED has been used to replace published-date in the latest > proposal, reusing a previous Microformat property, which is a Good > Thing (tm). > -http://microformats.org/wiki/audio-info-issues#published-date_Property > > hAudio ISSUE #6: Summary Property is Missing > - DESCRIPTION has been added to the latest proposal. > - http://microformats.org/wiki/audio-info-proposal#Description > > hAudio ISSUE #7: Track Number is Missing > - POSITION has been added to the hAudio proposal, thus resolving this > issue. > - http://microformats.org/wiki/audio-info-proposal#Position > > hAudio ISSUE #8: hAlbum is redundant > - We now have the ALBUM-TITLE and TRACK elements in hAudio, there is no > longer a need for hAlbum. > - http://microformats.org/wiki/audio-info-proposal#Schema > > hAudio ISSUE #12: CONTRIBUTOR and TRACK are not publisher friendly > - Short forms for CONTRIBUTOR and TRACK are proposed in the newest > proposal and doesn't seem to cause any parsing problems or > compatibility issues with other Microformats. > - http://microformats.org/wiki/audio-info-proposal#Contributor > - http://microformats.org/wiki/audio-info-proposal#Track > > If there are no objections, I would like to mark each as a "Resolved Issue"
No Objections although I do have concerns with the track definition http://microformats.org/wiki/audio-info-proposal#Track A container for another hAudio item. Used in conjunction with album-title. * The element is identified by the class name track. * hAudio MAY have one or more tracks, but MUST have album-title defined. If album-title is not defined, track cannot be defined. * The element MUST be processed opaquely. No sub-elements should be read from any hAudio contained in a track element. * The contents of the element MAY be plain-text or marked up using hAudio. In Particular "hAudio MAY have one or more tracks, but MUST have album-title defined. If album-title is not defined, track cannot be defined" ? What Happens when I want to mark up a single track from an Album that may be part of a collection, best of, or compilation? I would Like to mark my page up like this: <div class="haudio"> <div class="track"> <span class="audio-title">Spanish Bombs</span> <abbr class="duration" title="P191T">3:18</abbr> taken from the <span class="album-title">London Calling</span> album By <span class="contributor">The Clash</span> </div> <div class="track"> <span class="audio-title">Nagasaki Nightmare</span> <abbr class="duration" title="P268T">4:46</abbr> taken from the <span class="album-title">Best Before 1984</span> album By <span class="contributor">Crass</span> </div> </div> Seems to make sense but according to the Proposal this Is Invalid hAudio Maybe like this then? <div class="haudio"> <div class="track"> <span class="audio-title">Spanish Bombs</span> <abbr class="duration" title="P191T">3:18</abbr> </div> taken from the <span class="album-title">London Calling</span> album By <span class="contributor">The Clash</span> </div> <div class="haudio"> <div class="track"> <span class="audio-title">Nagasaki Nightmare</span> <abbr class="duration" title="P268T">4:46</abbr> </div> taken from the <span class="album-title">Best Before 1984</span> album By <span class="contributor">Crass</span> </div> Seems like valid hAudio but Is not because the contents of a hAudio track must either be marked up as text or as hAudio <div class="haudio"> <div class="track haudio"> <span class="audio-title">Spanish Bombs</span> <abbr class="duration" title="P191T">3:18</abbr> </div> taken from the <span class="album-title">London Calling</span> album By <span class="contributor">The Clash</span> </div> <div class="haudio"> <div class="track haudio"> <span class="audio-title">Nagasaki Nightmare</span> <abbr class="duration" title="P268T">4:46</abbr> </div> taken from the <span class="album-title">Best Before 1984</span> album By <span class="contributor">Crass</span> </div> This Is Valid hAudio my concerns are Do we really need to reiterate haudio In the track class It seems confusing that hAudio Is both a parent and a child class. used in the above context haudio has the same meaning as track? I think the proposition should simply say * "hAudio MAY have zero or more tracks" * "Track titles MAY be defined by using the class name *audio-title* it is recommended that a hAudio track SHOULD have an audio-title" * This would enable Greater flexibility when publishing hAudio. Thanks Martin > -- manu > _______________________________________________ > microformats-new mailing list > [email protected] > http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-new _______________________________________________ microformats-new mailing list [email protected] http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-new
