Hello David
David Janes wrote:
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 11:15 AM, Toby A Inkster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
David Janes wrote:
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 9:42 AM, Martin McEvoy <martin at
weborganics.co.uk> wrote:
* reply[1] (comment-link) 60%
o By adding "rel-reply" the author is indicating that the page
http://someblog/post#comment-001 is a reply for the referring page (see
example).
Martin, you've explained this a few times on the list, and I have to admit,
this is the first time I've "got it". Yes, this does make sense as a
solution. rel="reply bookmark" would be even better.
I withdraw my comment about semantic nonsense and apologize to Martin
for my tone. I thought this was the in-reply-to proposal.
No worries David we all say things we shouldn't discourse in any
discussion like this usually ends in progress in my view ;-)
However, how is the different than saying a comment is marked up as
"hentry comment", which will work on close to 100% [1] of the
exemplars instead of 60%?
I have always liked "hentry comment" I made a fleeting attempt to
propose it in an earlier message,
http://microformats.org/discuss/mail/microformats-new/2008-November/001889.html
I still think this is the best way to go, but it got lost in the
following discussion ;-)
Regards, etc...
[1] there are universal issues for all proposals with blogger DL lists
Best wishes
--
Martin McEvoy
http://weborganics.co.uk/
_______________________________________________
microformats-new mailing list
microformats-new@microformats.org
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-new
