Hi

Since Archimedes screws are used to pump waste water
the opposite way (produce energy) will work as well.
with 6 feet (about 2m) and 40000(us)gpm (about
3000l/s) you will get about 50 kW. the screw will,
instead of any kind of turbine, not clogg that fast.
this project is a good thing, please keep it going

regard

thomas

 
--- Radu Babau - VARSPEED Hydro
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> Hello Ken,
> 
> 
> A rough calculation shows the opportunity to get
> ~150 kW output power, using a Kaplan or propellor
> turbine.
> 
> However, the discharge of a waste water plant is not
> always that clean as you would like to believe.
> Those tiny suspension particles will make the
> turbine to clogg randomly, so it has to be cleaned
> quite often in comparison with clean water turbines.
> There is also higher errosion due to small metal and
> sand particles. This means higher general maitenance
> costs. One simple idea is to reverse the turbine
> speed once a day, using a softstarter for instance.
> The water turbulence would contribute to rotor
> cleaning, so you will have to seldom dismantle and
> clean it manually.
> 
> Since you say the flow is constant, you could use a
> constant speed induction generator, and a fixed
> pitch rotor. Things with moving blades will have
> higher chances to get gripped by the muddy water.
> Please choose carefully the rotor characteristics.
> 
> It's a feasible idea after all. There are
> experienced guys in the group who could put you on
> the track for a good propellor supplier. The first
> name which crosses my mind right now is Peter
> Ruyter, www.cargo-kraft.se
> 
> BR,
> 
> Radu
> 
> 
> ----- Forwarded message from Ken Carman
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -----
>     Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 16:48:21 -0800 (PST)
>     From: Ken Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: Ken Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: waste water discharge . .  .
>       To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> Our city has a large water treatment facility with a
> discharge that has a head
> of 6 to 8 feet and a constant year-round flow of
> nearly 40,000 gpm.  Is this a
> good opportunity to persue putting a turbine on or
> not?
> 
> Ken    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> ----- End forwarded message -----
> 
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been
> removed]
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 


        

        
                
___________________________________________________________ 
Gesendet von Yahoo! Mail - Jetzt mit 250MB Speicher kostenlos - Hier anmelden: 
http://mail.yahoo.de





------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
Has someone you know been affected by illness or disease?
Network for Good is THE place to support health awareness efforts!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/RzSHvD/UOnJAA/79vVAA/FGYolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

Does your company feature in the microhydro business directory at 
http://microhydropower.net/directory ? If not, please register free of charge 
and be exposed to the microhydro community world wide!

NOTE: The advertisements in this email are added by Yahoogroups who provides us 
with free email group services. The microhydro-group does not endorse products 
or support the advertisements in any way. 

More information on micro hydropower at http://microhydropower.net

To unsubscribe: send empty message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/microhydro/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Reply via email to