Ami Ganguli wrote:
>
> Does anybody have a preference as to how an alternate database backend should
> be selected? I can think of three options:
>
> 1. Alter mgd_init to take the name of a dynamic library as a parameter. The
> library would hold database specific functions. I think this is best but it
> would require an API change.
>
> 2. A compile time option to select one backend only.
>
> 3. A totally separate library with separate source tree.
>
> The list is roughly in order from best to worst, and most difficult to least
> difficult IMHO.
>
> Let me know what you think.
Midgard-dev had serious thread about database driver layer in May, you
may look in archives at mar.theaimsgroup.com/?l=midgard-dev or at
experimental Bergius' rewrite of the MPRy site
http://bergie.greywolves.org:8081/archive/midgard-dev/
--
AB
--
This is The Midgard Project's mailing list. For more information,
please visit the project's web site at http://www.midgard-project.org
To unsubscribe the list, send an empty email message to address
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
