Le 27/03/2012 17:37, Ted Lemon a écrit :
I think this [16 bit vs 32 bit lifetimes] is an issue. It
generates additional work to the implementer. If one agrees that
it is good to store the DHCP default route in the existing ND data
structures, then one notices a conversion is needed. If these
lifetime fields were expressed in the same number of bits
(preferably 16bit, because that exists already) then the
implementer would be relieved from conversion work.
I wanted to ask the oppinion of the WG about this issue.
You already asked the working group this question, and got responses
at least from me.
What do the others think?
Has something changed since you last asked that encourages you to ask
again, or are you just hoping for a different answer this time?
We need to fix this in Paris.
Alex
_______________________________________________
mif mailing list
mif@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mif
