This issue claims that walled-garden use cases are invalid based on text from 
RFC 3002, which is an informational IAB report from an invitation-only IAB 
workshop held in 2000.  

There has been some list discussion explaining that use cases #1, #5 and #7 are 
not inherently walled-garden use cases.

Also, it is not required that our work comply with the opinions expressed in 
IAB workshop reports.  Workshop reports are not even IETF consensus documents, 
and they do not place requirements on IETF protocol work.

My proposed resolution is to close these issues with no changes to the document.

Thoughts?
Margaret

_______________________________________________
mif mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mif

Reply via email to