Le 19/03/2013 16:03, pierrick.se...@orange.com a écrit :
Ok, so, being more generic than MIP, the problem is about
simultaneous usage (not sequential) of physical and virtual
interfaces, on a single physical interface.
I agree in this sense.
(to me 'simultaneous use' is when we say simultaneous use for bandwidth
augmentation. Distinct HAroute and defroute - what we discuss above -
is a method to do mobility registration at the same time as traffic, but
does not offer bandwidth augmentation.)
For the pure use of interfaces in a sequential manner, I dont see
anything else than a Mobile IP problem, which is solved, as you say.
This problem is identified in MIF problem statement.
Ok.
Alex
Pierrick
-----Message d'origine----- De : Alexandru Petrescu
[mailto:alexandru.petre...@gmail.com] Envoyé : mardi 19 mars 2013
15:34 À : SEITE Pierrick OLNC/OLN Cc : Ted Lemon; <mif@ietf.org>
Objet : Re: [mif] Call for volunteers about architecture design
Le 19/03/2013 10:13, pierrick.se...@orange.com a écrit :
Hi Alex,
Except the problem of access discovery and selection, I'm not
sure there are multiple provisioning domains issues with
sequential use of interfaces.
I am not sure either.
If continuous sessions are needed after a handover WiFi-3G (each
is in a different provisioning domain), then Mobile IP should be
used; if Mobile IP is used then there is a routing problem at the
initial setup phase (the default route points to a tunnel interface
but the HA should be reached with a host-specific route on the
real interface).
There could be advice from HA to mobile to tell it how to set up
that route (use one the real interface for reaching HA and the
tunnel interface for all other traffic). This advice is just
another kind of advice that should be taken with precaution.
Or there could be a visual interface on the terminal to set
manually the default route and other specific routes. (was already
said).
Alex
This is something we can do with current terminal... Maybe I'm
wrong but, anyway, I guess the architecture work will start with
discussion on use-cases to identify what is relevant or not.
Pierrick
-----Message d'origine----- De : mif-boun...@ietf.org
[mailto:mif-boun...@ietf.org] De la part de Alexandru Petrescu
Envoyé
: lundi 18 mars 2013 15:58 À : Ted Lemon Cc : <mif@ietf.org>
Objet : Re: [mif] Call for volunteers about architecture
design
Le 17/03/2013 12:51, Ted Lemon a écrit :
On Mar 16, 2013, at 9:38 PM, Alexandru Petrescu
<alexandru.petre...@gmail.com> wrote:
This kind of problem - make one virtual interface to link
all
other
interfaces together, with goals such as bandwidth
augmentation, on a Mobile Router (not a Host) - is
discussed in the ITS Intelligent Transportation Systems
email list ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/its
(this is one problem being considered there, but there are
other ITS problems considered there. And there there is
thought that
MIF
may consider this case - it seems not.)
I think we should definitely consider this problem in the
architecture discussion. Whether it's in-scope or out of
scope is another question.
In addition to simultaneous use of multiple interfaces for
bandwidth augmentation on a low-ratio egress-ingress bandwidth
Mobile Router (its egress bandwith is much lower than ingress
bandwidth),
there is another aspect which deserves mentioning in a mif'ed
Host: the use of Mobile IP and handovers. This would be such
that a Host to offer highly available connections - when WiFi
is available use WiFi, but if cellular is available then use
cellular. This could be
a
sequential use of interfaces (only one interface is used
exclusively), as opposed to simultaneous use of interfaces.
The architecture aspect in this is the difference between
simultaneous vs sequential use of interfaces. This could be
illustrated with pictures of topology.
This is something very complex to deal with.
Alex
_______________________________________________ mif mailing
list mif@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mif
______________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________
Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations
confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre
diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez
recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur
et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages
electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, France Telecom -
Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere,
deforme ou falsifie. Merci.
This message and its attachments may contain confidential or
privileged information that may be protected by law; they should
not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you
have received this email in error, please notify the sender and
delete
this
message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, France
Telecom - Orange is not liable for messages that have been
modified, changed or falsified. Thank you.
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations
confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre
diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce
message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le
detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques
etant susceptibles d'alteration, France Telecom - Orange decline
toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie.
Merci.
This message and its attachments may contain confidential or
privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not
be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have
received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete
this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, France
Telecom - Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified,
changed or falsified. Thank you.
_______________________________________________
mif mailing list
mif@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mif