Karl,

 

You may not think much of me – fair enough – as long as my wife does I’m a 
happy guy.  But I promise that not everyone who disagrees with you is evil or 
stupid!

 

Hubert Horan says that airlines are out to screw customers.  To some extent 
that’s right but it doesn’t mean that this new technology allows them to do it. 
 My suggestion is that the mechanism by which it will help airlines generate 
incremental revenue is greater price discrimination, better tailoring whom to 
offer the lowest fares.  And maybe that’s screwing the customer – perfectly 
fair to hold that view.  I think I’ve been pretty non-normative in thinking 
through this.  I’m not saying ā€œAI is good for youā€ I’m saying, let’s think 
about the economics of the product and what AI will accomplish in the near-term.

 

As we all know, an airline seat that takes off empty can never be sold again.  
And carrying a marginal passenger comes at extremely low cost to an airline.  
Most of the expense of a trip is baked in – the plane, fuel, crew.

 

Airlines have gotten much better at filling seats.  And they try to maximize 
revenue – yet the real cost of a ticket has fallen over time, inclusive of 
fees.  That’s no accident.

 

*       Airlines will sell that marginal seat for almost any amount they can 
get for it
*       Except they don’t want to offer a lower fare to someone that would buy 
the seat anyway, at a higher fare
*       And so airlines go to great lengths to price discriminate, segment 
customers.

 

There have been lots of tools for this over time, like Saturday night stays and 
advance purchase requirements to separate price-insensitive business travelers 
from more price-sensitive leisure travelers – in order to offer the lower fares 
only to the latter group.  That’s what basic economy is all about, offering 
cheap flights that are just annoying enough they won’t be an option for 
businesses who will spend more.

 

AI is another tool to get more granular with price discrimination.  And so it 
seems reasonably likely that it’ll be used to figure out whom to offer those 
lower fares to, filling more seats at even lower fares but only offering those 
prices to people who wouldn’t buy at all at a higher price.  Airlines can fill 
seats and generate incremental revenue without cannibalizing existing higher 
yield traffic.

 

And what of the fear that an airline will know your aunt died and you are 
highly motivated to attend her funeral?  That ticket will generate valuable 
incremental revenue to whichever airline gets it.  So if one airline (in this 
case, say, Delta) offers you $2,000 when they’ll sell the ticket to someone 
else for $600… then United will offer it at $1,800… and American at $1,500 and 
Southwest at $1,200 and Spirit will come along, desperate for any revenue after 
a first quarter in which they generated a -27% margin and offer it to you for 
$500.

 

Our best defense against AI pricing of the parade of horribles sort (besides 
our own personal AI!) is competition.  Which is a whole separate topic that I 
very much worry about, but not necessarily for the same reasons that are most 
commonplace.

 

Best,

Gary

 

p.s. I’d love to hear why you believe I’m mistaken – that’s an opportunity for 
learning – and not just that you think I’m an idiot 😊 

 

 

From: Karl L. Swartz via Mifnet <[email protected]> 
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2025 4:27 PM
To: Mifnet <[email protected]>
Cc: Karl L. Swartz <[email protected]>
Subject: [Mifnet šŸ›° 73239] Re: Why does anyone think that airline "AI pricing" 
will benefit consumers?

 

Your points just reinforce my view of Gary Leff, which is that he does a 
lightweight job of reporting with minimal substance. He’s better than Simpleton 
Flying, but that’s a very low shadow to surmount.

 

 -- Karl

 

On Jul 22, 2025, at 1:28 PM, Hubert Horan via Mifnet <[email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]> > wrote:

 

Gary Leff published a follow up to the Delta ā€œAI pricingā€ article [1] 
previously posted on the Mifnet. As with the first article, it includes Glen 
Hauenstein quotes claiming that this he was anticipating ā€œa full re-engineering 
of how we price, and how we will be pricing in the futureā€ – Delta was working 
to ā€œget inside the mind of our consumer and present them something that is 
relevant to them, at the right time, at the right price.ā€

But unlike the first article Leff claimed that AI pricing at Delta would be a 
wonderful thing for consumers because it would mean ā€œlower prices, rather than 
higher prices and agreeing to AI pricing could even become a requirement of 
airline elite status.ā€ This makes absolutely no sense to me. Leff didn’t 
support this claim with any explanation of how Delta’s ā€œAI pricingā€ would 
actually work, or what the overall effect of ā€œAI pricingā€ might be. He didn’t 
quote anyone with direct experience with today’s pricing/yield management 
practices or anyone familiar with LLCs in consumer pricing. Can anyone explain 
how one might conclude that Delta’s ā€œAI pricingā€ would produce lower overall 
prices?

Why would Delta undertake a major project if it thought the net result would be 
lower fares? Maximizing its share and yield from ā€œhigh-endā€ passengers has been 
central to Delta’s strategy for the last decade. Why would it highlight the 
project to investors, who are only interested in evidence of the market power 
needed to extract higher and higher fares?

Delta (and its competitors) already have very high load factors. Figuring out 
how to sell more cheap tickets makes no sense unless you have tons of empty 
seats, and even then airlines understand the solution is to cut capacity. And 
selling more cheap seats is the easy part of revenue management (if you are 
departing with lots of empty seats don’t shut off discount sales so soon). 
Figuring out how to grab a few more dollars from the last seats on high-demand 
flights is the hard part. 

Hypothetically ā€œAI systemsā€ might be of some value in pricing tickets to very 
frequent/higher-yield passengers although no one has explained what exact 
information about these passengers an LLC might use, where the new info would 
come from, or how it would be used to change the fare displays those customers 
might see. But most domestic pax are very infrequent flyers. I vaguely recall a 
Scott Kirby quote saying something like 80% of his traffic only bought one 
ticket a year. What info would an LLC be able to collect on these more 
price-sensitive passengers, and how would it determine that a customized deeper 
discount would get this person to buy but not this other person? 

Leff’s point about trying to force Delta customers with elite status into an 
AI-driven sales channel might be correct, but I suspect there’d be backlash, 
and as Leff notes most of these folks would know how to determine whether they 
are getting the market fare. But this falls into the ā€œforcing our best 
customers to pay even higher fares than they do nowā€ category, not the offer 
consumers lower fares category. 

I understand that ā€œforcing our best customers to pay even higher fares than 
they do nowā€ may be a strategic priority at Delta given the lack of obvious 
other ways to quickly juice profits. But that approach would logically focus on 
forcing them into captive, controlled channels, and preventing them from being 
able to readily access information about competitive alternatives. All of which 
should be seen as pure evil by anyone who thinks ā€œmarket competitionā€ is a good 
thing. Again it is not clear what the LLC vendors are offering that could 
actually make Delta’s higher-yield frequent flyers more willing to use captive, 
controlled channels.

There is a bit of a parallel here with ongoing Mifnet discussion about 
ATC/airline reliability issues. No one stops to explain what they think the 
deficiencies of longstanding airline pricing/revenue management systems are. 
What is preventing these weel-developed systems from maximizing network unit 
revenue today? We jump immediately to an announcement that we are throwing big 
bucks at consultants offering a fancy sounding ā€œtechnologicalā€ solution without 
ever explaining exactly what the new technology does (that the current 
technology couldn’t) and how it will solve the defined problem. 

Since no one (including airline investors and executives) takes that approach, 
reporting is dominated by PR hackery based on transparently false claims. 
Airline ā€œAI pricingā€ is just the same type of ā€œprice discriminationā€ we’ve seen 
for decades (as Hauenstein says it’s an attempt to radically reengineer 
traditional pricing). Like traditional revenue management it will drive major 
efficiency/productivity gains (none of the conditions that allowed traditional 
revenue management to improve overall efficiency in past decades exist 
anymore). It will hugely benefit consumers by lowering prices (a sure signal 
that the real objective is to screw consumers). 

 

[1] 
https://viewfromthewing.com/several-airlines-now-quietly-let-ai-set-ticket-prices-surprisingly-thats-great-news-for-your-wallet/

 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Revised: 20250507

You are receiving The Mifnet because you requested to join this list.

The Mifnet is largely a labor of love, however the infrastructure isn't exactly 
cost-free. If you'd care to make a small contribution to the effort, please 
know that it would be greatly appreciated:
https://wardell.us/url/mifbit

All posts sent to the list should abide by these policies:

1) List members acknowledge that participation in Mifnet is a privilege--not a 
right.
2) Posts are always off the record, absent specific permission from the author.
3) The tone of discussions is collegial.
4) Posts are expected to be in reasonably good taste.
5) We discuss ideas and not personalities, and we don't speak ill of other 
Mifnet members.

* The Mifnet WEB SITE is:
 https://www.mifnet.com/

* To UNSUBSCRIBE from this list at any time please visit:
 https://lists.mifnet.com/
 OR: SEND THIS MESSAGE via email: [email protected]?subject=leave 
<mailto:[email protected]?subject=leave> 

* Send Mifnet mailing list POSTS/SUBMISSIONS to:
 [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> 

* You may reach the person managing The Mifnet at:
 [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> 

* Please consider the DIGEST version of The Mifnet, which consolidates all list 
traffic into 1-3
 messages daily. See instructions at:
 https://lists.mifnet.com/

* Manage your personal Mifnet SUBSCRIPTION at:
 https://lists.mifnet.com/

* For a list of all available Mifnet commands, SEND THIS MESSAGE via email:
 [email protected]?subject=help 
<mailto:[email protected]?subject=help> 

* View The Mifnet LIST POLICIES and PRIVACY POLICY at:
 https://mifnet.com/index.php/policies

* View instructions for Mifnet DELIVERY PROBLEMS at:
 https://mifnet.com/index.php/delivery-problems

* View The Mifnet LIST ARCHIVE at:
 https://lists.mifnet.com/hyperkitty/list/[email protected]/

 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Revised: 20250507

You are receiving The Mifnet because you requested to join this list.

The Mifnet is largely a labor of love, however the infrastructure isn't exactly 
cost-free. If you'd care to make a small contribution to the effort, please 
know that it would be greatly appreciated:
https://wardell.us/url/mifbit

All posts sent to the list should abide by these policies:

1) List members acknowledge that participation in Mifnet is a privilege--not a 
right.
2) Posts are always off the record, absent specific permission from the author.
3) The tone of discussions is collegial.
4) Posts are expected to be in reasonably good taste.
5) We discuss ideas and not personalities, and we don't speak ill of other 
Mifnet members.

* The Mifnet WEB SITE is:
  https://www.mifnet.com/

* To UNSUBSCRIBE from this list at any time please visit:
  https://lists.mifnet.com/
  OR: SEND THIS MESSAGE via email: [email protected]?subject=leave

* Send Mifnet mailing list POSTS/SUBMISSIONS to:
  [email protected]

* You may reach the person managing The Mifnet at:
  [email protected]

* Please consider the DIGEST version of The Mifnet, which consolidates all list 
traffic into 1-3
  messages daily. See instructions at:
  https://lists.mifnet.com/

* Manage your personal Mifnet SUBSCRIPTION at:
  https://lists.mifnet.com/

* For a list of all available Mifnet commands, SEND THIS MESSAGE via email:
  [email protected]?subject=help

* View The Mifnet LIST POLICIES and PRIVACY POLICY at:
  https://mifnet.com/index.php/policies

* View instructions for Mifnet DELIVERY PROBLEMS at:
  https://mifnet.com/index.php/delivery-problems

* View The Mifnet LIST ARCHIVE at:
  https://lists.mifnet.com/hyperkitty/list/[email protected]/

Reply via email to