most likely that's just an uncaught, ignored exception from:

org.mifos.application.accounts.struts.action.TestApplyAdjustmentAction.testAdjustmentForZeroPmnt
(TestApplyAdjustmentAction.java:309)

to fix this, you should add a catch block for this exception and explicitly
ignore it so that it doesn't fall into stdout and confuse other developers.

On Dec 4, 2007 3:05 AM, Dion Dodgen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I seem to be getting 1 error when running the test suite for revision
> 12211, but all tests seem to be passing.
>
> <system-out><![CDATA[ERROR, org.mifos, MifosExceptionHandler,
> logException , 72, No resource is associated with key
> "exception.accounts.ApplicationException.CannotAdjust"., 04 Dec 2007
> 01:07:50
> ERROR, org.mifos, MifosExceptionHandler, logException , 72,
> exception.accounts.ApplicationException.CannotAdjust, 04 Dec 2007
> 01:07:50
> org.mifos.application.accounts.exceptions.AccountException:
> exception.accounts.ApplicationException.CannotAdjust
>        at
> org.mifos.application.accounts.business.AccountBO.adjustLastPayment(
> AccountBO.java:370)
>        at
> org.mifos.application.accounts.struts.action.ApplyAdjustment.applyAdjustment
> (ApplyAdjustment.java:144)
>        at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
>        at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(
> NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
>        at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(
> DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
>        at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)
>        at org.apache.struts.actions.DispatchAction.dispatchMethod(
> DispatchAction.java:274)
>        at org.apache.struts.actions.DispatchAction.execute(
> DispatchAction.java:194)
>        at org.mifos.framework.struts.action.BaseAction.execute(
> BaseAction.java:72)
>        at org.apache.struts.action.RequestProcessor.processActionPerform(
> RequestProcessor.java:419)
>        at org.apache.struts.action.RequestProcessor.process(
> RequestProcessor.java:224)
>        at org.apache.struts.action.ActionServlet.process(
> ActionServlet.java:1194)
>        at org.apache.struts.action.ActionServlet.doPost(ActionServlet.java
> :432)
>        at servletunit.struts.MockStrutsTestCase.actionPerform(
> MockStrutsTestCase.java:290)
>        at
> org.mifos.application.accounts.struts.action.TestApplyAdjustmentAction.testAdjustmentForZeroPmnt
> (TestApplyAdjustmentAction.java:309)
>        at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
>        at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(
> NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
>        at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(
> DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
>        at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)
>        at junit.framework.TestCase.runTest(TestCase.java:168)
>        at junit.framework.TestCase.runBare(TestCase.java:134)
>        at junit.framework.TestResult$1.protect(TestResult.java:110)
>        at junit.framework.TestResult.runProtected(TestResult.java:128)
>        at junit.framework.TestResult.run(TestResult.java:113)
>        at junit.framework.TestCase.run(TestCase.java:124)
>        at junit.framework.TestSuite.runTest(TestSuite.java:232)
>        at junit.framework.TestSuite.run(TestSuite.java:227)
>        at junit.framework.TestSuite.runTest(TestSuite.java:232)
>        at junit.framework.TestSuite.run(TestSuite.java:227)
>        at junit.framework.TestSuite.runTest(TestSuite.java:232)
>        at junit.framework.TestSuite.run(TestSuite.java:227)
>        at org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.optional.junit.JUnitTestRunner.run
> (JUnitTestRunner.java:421)
>        at
> org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.optional.junit.JUnitTestRunner.launch(
> JUnitTestRunner.java:912)
>        at
> org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.optional.junit.JUnitTestRunner.main(
> JUnitTestRunner.java:766)
> ERROR, org.mifos, MifosExceptionHandler, logException , 72, You do not
> have permissions to perform this activity. Contact your system
> administrator to grant you required permissions and try again., 04 Dec
> 2007 01:08:45
> org.mifos.framework.exceptions.ServiceException:
> error.activity.not.allowed
>        at
> org.mifos.application.accounts.business.service.AccountBusinessService.checkPermissionForStatusChange
> (AccountBusinessService.java:332)
>        at
> org.mifos.application.accounts.struts.action.EditStatusAction.checkPermission
> (EditStatusAction.java:245)
>        at
> org.mifos.application.accounts.struts.action.EditStatusAction.update(
> EditStatusAction.java:130)
>
>
> Does anybody else get this?
>
> Thanks,
> Dion
>
>
> On Dec 3, 2007 1:57 PM, Tom Bostelmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Thanks Dion, apologies for taking a while before getting back to you on
> > this.  Almost there :)
> >
> >  If you're adding a new test, please add it to a package test suite and
> not
> > the main ApplicationTestSuite.  If you end up having to create a new
> package
> > test suite, then add that test suite to the parent package's test suite.
> >
> >  Also as a side-note to other developers, make sure that all tests can
> be
> > executed independently, they should not have a dependency on another
> test.
> > Dion, your tests look fine here.  I'm just adding this as a reminder to
> the
> > other developers.
> >
> >
> >
> > On Nov 25, 2007 10:56 PM, Dion Dodgen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Hi Tom,
> > >
> > > Hope you had a good weekend :) I have integrated all resources into
> > > the single patch file.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On 11/22/07, Tom Bostelmann < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Dion, the patch needs contain all of the contents of the patch in
> one
> > file.
> > > > There are a couple files, namely 'OffsetTestSuite.java' and
> > > > 'TestOffsetAccountBO.java ' that should be incorporated in the
> patch.
> > > >
> > > > Can you fix this and then submit it again?  It'd make my life a
> little
> > > > easier ;)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Nov 17, 2007 11:17 PM, Dion Dodgen < [EMAIL PROTECTED] >
> > wrote:
> > > > > Great thanks Tom.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Nov 16, 2007 6:07 PM, Tom Bostelmann < [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> > > > > > Thanks Dion!  I added it to the patch queue - probably going to
> be
> > next
> > > > week
> > > > > > before I get back to you, though.  Here's the queue wiki:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > http://mifos.org/developers/wiki/MifosPatchQueue
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Nov 14, 2007 4:58 AM, Dion Dodgen < [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hi Tom, all,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Sorry for the delay, hope you well.
> > > > > > > I have reworked the initial patch. All tests pass using the
> > correct
> > > > > > > time zone and db use_lower_case_table_names=1.
> > > > > > > I would like to patch this dependency as soon as offsetting
> > reaches
> > > > > > maturity.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > This patch covers all the persistence needs for the Offsetting
> > module.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I am now on suse 10.3 :)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > Dion
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > >
> >
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
> > > > > > > Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
> > > > > > > Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a
> > > > browser.
> > > > > > > Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >>
> http://get.splunk.com/
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > >
> >
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
> > > > > > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
> > > > > > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> >
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
> > > > > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
> > > > > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> >
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
> > > > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
> > > > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
> > > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
> > > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > SF.Net email is sponsored by: The Future of Linux Business White Paper
> > from Novell.  From the desktop to the data center, Linux is going
> > mainstream.  Let it simplify your IT future.
> > http://altfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/8857-50307-18918-4
> >
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> SF.Net email is sponsored by: The Future of Linux Business White Paper
> from Novell.  From the desktop to the data center, Linux is going
> mainstream.  Let it simplify your IT future.
> http://altfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/8857-50307-18918-4
>
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by: The Future of Linux Business White Paper
from Novell.  From the desktop to the data center, Linux is going
mainstream.  Let it simplify your IT future.
http://altfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/8857-50307-18918-4

Reply via email to