It is not necessary to force all the coding convention rules in one go, we 
can keep adding rules as and when appropriate. 

We should really consider using checkstyle, and I think if we have a 
standard checkstyle guidelines, we can import it into eclipse so eclipse 
uses it for formatting the code.

I am facing some issues with eclipse reformatting my code, breaking into 
more lines than I want, so if something like checkstyle is in place, I can 
be sure of what eclipse is doing.


Regards,
Amiruddin Nagri,
ThoughtWorks Technologies India Pvt. Ltd.,
2nd Floor, Tower C, Diamond District, Airport road,
Bangalore, 560008, KA
India 

Y! IM : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GTalk : [EMAIL PROTECTED]




"Van Mittal-Henkle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
12/18/2007 06:59 AM
Please respond to
Developer <[email protected]>


To
"Developer" <[email protected]>
cc

Subject
Re: [Mifos-developer] Developer questions       relatedtomifos 
application(build issues)






Hi Nazir,
 
Checkstyle looks like an interesting tool, but I'm not sure we're quite 
ready for something like that at this point unless we used it in a fairly 
limited way.  Let's see if we can get our test case names refactored 
first.
 
In the meantime, if you would like to experiment with Checkstyle to see if 
it could enforce the test case naming convention, then go for it! (and 
report back to the list on how it works).  I suspect that if we ran the 
full style check, we would get a very long list to go through ;-) 
 
Cheers,
--Van

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nazir 
LAJDEL
Sent: Sunday, December 16, 2007 11:04 PM
To: Developer
Subject: Re: [Mifos-developer] Developer questions relatedtomifos 
application(build issues)

Hi Van,
 
>But no matter how the test runs are organized, I would still be in favor 
of using a naming convention for the sake of consistency. 
>I'll put forward the suggestion of following the convention 
<classname>Test for test class names.  This convention should make code 
completion more convenient than Test<classname>.  So the proposal is >that 
when someone writes the class MyClass then they would write MyClassTest to 
go along with it.. 
>If anyone else in the community has comments one way or another regarding 
this, please chime in. After others have had a chance to comment, then if 
we're in agreement, we can put this on our list of refactoring >to do. 
 
 
I suggest setting up a development tool to help programmers write Java 
code that adheres to a coding standard.We can automate the process of 
checking Java code to spare humans of this boring (but important) task. 
For example; ?Checkstyle? can check many aspects of your source code. It?s 
highly configurable and can be made to support almost any coding standard. 

Thoughts?
 
- Nazir
 
 -------------------------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
It's the best place to buy or sell services
for just about anything Open Source.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
It's the best place to buy or sell services
for just about anything Open Source.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace

Reply via email to