[
http://mifosforge.jira.com/browse/MIFOS-3479?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
keithwoodlock updated MIFOS-3479:
---------------------------------
Component/s: Loan Account
Description:
To repro:
1) make a repayment to close a loan
2) see that in the database there is a row showing the account has changed to
closed_obligation_met in the account_status_change_history table, and the
close_date of the account table for the loan has been set.
3) now apply an adjustment to the loan, removing the last payment, which makes
the loan open again.
4) see that in the database the close_date and account_status_change_history
tables have not been updated to reflect the adjustment
expected behavior:
the account_status_change_history and account tables should not show that this
loan is closed.
this bug makes it hard (or impossible?) to accurately get a historical count of
active loans for a date in the past, which is very important to know for the
business owners of an MFI.
open question:
should the close_date of the loan reflect the payment date or the action_date
for the payment that closed the loan? It seems to currently show the
action_date, but would payment_date make more sense when a backdated
transaction is entered?
For business purposes, the loan was closed when the final payment was made, not
when the data was entered. If the PMs agree the close_date should be the
payment_date and not the action_date, perhaps we should enter a separate bug
for that?
was:
To repro:
1) make a repayment to close a loan
2) see that in the database there is a row showing the account has changed to
closed_obligation_met in the account_status_change_history table, and the
close_date of the account table for the loan has been set.
3) now apply an adjustment to the loan, removing the last payment, which makes
the loan open again.
4) see that in the database the close_date and account_status_change_history
tables have not been updated to reflect the adjustment
expected behavior:
the account_status_change_history and account tables should not show that this
loan is closed.
this bug makes it hard (or impossible?) to accurately get a historical count of
active loans for a date in the past, which is very important to know for the
business owners of an MFI.
open question:
should the close_date of the loan reflect the payment date or the action_date
for the payment that closed the loan? It seems to currently show the
action_date, but would payment_date make more sense when a backdated
transaction is entered?
For business purposes, the loan was closed when the final payment was made, not
when the data was entered. If the PMs agree the close_date should be the
payment_date and not the action_date, perhaps we should enter a separate bug
for that?
Fix Version/s: Unscheduled
> account_state_change_history and account tables not correctly updated when
> loan adjustments are made
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: MIFOS-3479
> URL: http://mifosforge.jira.com/browse/MIFOS-3479
> Project: mifos
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Loan Account
> Affects Versions: Release 1.5.1
> Reporter: Sam Birney
> Assignee: Kay Chau
> Priority: Major
> Labels: almajmoua
> Fix For: Unscheduled
>
>
> To repro:
> 1) make a repayment to close a loan
> 2) see that in the database there is a row showing the account has changed to
> closed_obligation_met in the account_status_change_history table, and the
> close_date of the account table for the loan has been set.
> 3) now apply an adjustment to the loan, removing the last payment, which
> makes the loan open again.
> 4) see that in the database the close_date and account_status_change_history
> tables have not been updated to reflect the adjustment
> expected behavior:
> the account_status_change_history and account tables should not show that
> this loan is closed.
> this bug makes it hard (or impossible?) to accurately get a historical count
> of active loans for a date in the past, which is very important to know for
> the business owners of an MFI.
> open question:
> should the close_date of the loan reflect the payment date or the action_date
> for the payment that closed the loan? It seems to currently show the
> action_date, but would payment_date make more sense when a backdated
> transaction is entered?
> For business purposes, the loan was closed when the final payment was made,
> not when the data was entered. If the PMs agree the close_date should be the
> payment_date and not the action_date, perhaps we should enter a separate bug
> for that?
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What Every C/C++ and Fortran developer Should Know!
Read this article and learn how Intel has extended the reach of its
next-generation tools to help Windows* and Linux* C/C++ and Fortran
developers boost performance applications - including clusters.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devmay
_______________________________________________
Mifos-issues mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mifos-issues
